Regional and supply-chain research

Construction materials and infrastructure / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study

Construction materials and infrastructure / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study. A dated 189-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 27 records (14.3% of this 189-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 162 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Producer services accounts for 32.3% here (61/189), compared with 24.5% in the parent set (69/282), an absolute gap of 7.8 percentage points.

78/189 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (41.3% of the cohort). The other 111 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1891891.0%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Construction materials and infrastructure, contains 282 records. This cohort contributes 189 (67.0%); 93 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 189 (1.0%); 19,108 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Construction materials and infrastructureGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · Producer services61/189 · 32.3%69/282 · 24.5%+7.81.328/93
sub-industry · Building materials9/189 · 4.8%31/282 · 11.0%-6.20.4322/93
industry · Next-generation information technology19/189 · 10.1%39/282 · 13.8%-3.80.7320/93
sub-industry · Infrastructure engineering46/189 · 24.3%59/282 · 20.9%+3.41.1613/93
industry · Advanced equipment25/189 · 13.2%46/282 · 16.3%-3.10.8121/93
sub-industry · Structural building materials60/189 · 31.7%81/282 · 28.7%+3.01.1121/93
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu27/189 · 14.3%33/282 · 11.7%+2.61.226/93
reporting jurisdiction · Shanghai9/189 · 4.8%20/282 · 7.1%-2.30.6711/93
reporting jurisdiction · Beijing8/189 · 4.2%18/282 · 6.4%-2.20.6610/93
reporting jurisdiction · Zhejiang13/189 · 6.9%25/282 · 8.9%-2.00.7812/93

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Producer services covers 8/93 remaining records (8.6%), an absolute gap of 23.7 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 29 labels; the top 3 contain 58/189 records (30.7%).Other known labels contain 131 records.

For 189 records with known labels, the effective category count is 15.5, versus 29 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 19 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Jiangsu2714.3%
Guangdong168.5%
Hebei157.9%
Zhejiang136.9%
Hubei136.9%
Shandong126.3%
Anhui105.3%
Shanghai94.8%
Tianjin94.8%
Ningbo94.8%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced materials, contains 13 records, or 48.1% of the 27 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
JiangsuAdvanced materials136.9%
HubeiProducer services105.3%
HebeiAdvanced materials94.8%
ShandongAdvanced materials63.2%
BeijingProducer services52.6%
TianjinProducer services52.6%
GuangdongAdvanced equipment52.6%
JiangsuProducer services52.6%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 81 non-empty cells; the other 73 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name189/189100.0%
reporting jurisdiction189/189100.0%
industry189/189100.0%
Recorded products189/189100.0%
sub-industry189/189100.0%
Chain labels189/189100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts78
Distinct corresponding companies78
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs81

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording31.6%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains63.2%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

40 of this cohort’s 189 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (21.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs4004040

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Traditional materials require product and manufacturing checks

The Structural building materials label covers 60 records (31.7% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Defined building products or production equipment with quality documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Construction Machinery Building Equipment Keyword Candidate Study: 48; records in this cohort but outside that set: 141. The intersection/union ratio is 12.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Prefabricated Steel Structure Components Keyword Candidate Study: 17; records in this cohort but outside that set: 172. The intersection/union ratio is 7.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Yingpurui Electronic Technology (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced equipment
Guangzhou Institute of Building Science Group Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
Xiangshan Conch Cement Co., Ltd.NingboAdvanced equipment
Ningbo Kehuan New Building Materials Co., Ltd.NingboEnergy conservation and environmental protection
Hunan Zhenhui Pipe Industry Co., Ltd.HunanAdvanced materials
Shanghai Jukun Technology Co., Ltd.ShanghaiEnergy conservation and environmental protection
Wuhu Taihe Pipe Industry Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced materials
BSS Jiangsu Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced materials

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions