Regional and supply-chain research

New energy and power equipment / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study

New energy and power equipment / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study. A dated 36-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shenzhen, contains 7 records (19.4% of this 36-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 29 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Power transmission and distribution equipment accounts for 13.9% here (5/36), compared with 36.3% in the parent set (752/2,072), an absolute gap of 22.4 percentage points.

14/36 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (38.9% of the cohort). The other 22 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
36360.2%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, New energy and power equipment, contains 2,072 records. This cohort contributes 36 (1.7%); 2,036 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 36 (0.2%); 19,261 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: New energy and power equipmentGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Power transmission and distribution equipment5/36 · 13.9%752/2,072 · 36.3%-22.40.38747/2,036
reporting jurisdiction · Shenzhen7/36 · 19.4%114/2,072 · 5.5%+13.93.53107/2,036
sub-industry · Traction batteries6/36 · 16.7%62/2,072 · 3.0%+13.75.5756/2,036
sub-industry · PV equipment and modules5/36 · 13.9%35/2,072 · 1.7%+12.28.2230/2,036
industry · Next-generation information technology6/36 · 16.7%100/2,072 · 4.8%+11.83.4594/2,036
industry · Advanced equipment9/36 · 25.0%703/2,072 · 33.9%-8.90.74694/2,036
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu5/36 · 13.9%363/2,072 · 17.5%-3.60.79358/2,036
industry · New energy and power equipment13/36 · 36.1%707/2,072 · 34.1%+2.01.06694/2,036
industry · New-energy vehicles6/36 · 16.7%366/2,072 · 17.7%-1.00.94360/2,036

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Power transmission and distribution equipment covers 747/2,036 remaining records (36.7%), an absolute gap of 22.8 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 13 labels; the top 3 contain 16/36 records (44.4%).Other known labels contain 20 records.

For 36 records with known labels, the effective category count is 9.3, versus 13 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 3 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Shenzhen719.4%
Jiangsu513.9%
Beijing411.1%
Hubei411.1%
Shanghai38.3%
Guangdong38.3%
Sichuan25.6%
Shandong25.6%
Zhejiang25.6%
Xiamen12.8%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Shenzhen × New-energy vehicles, contains 5 records, or 71.4% of the 7 records carrying the Shenzhen label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
ShenzhenNew-energy vehicles513.9%
JiangsuNew energy and power equipment411.1%
ShanghaiAdvanced equipment25.6%
BeijingNew energy and power equipment25.6%
BeijingAdvanced equipment25.6%
GuangdongNext-generation information technology25.6%
ShenzhenNew energy and power equipment25.6%
ShanghaiNext-generation information technology12.8%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 24 non-empty cells; the other 16 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name36/36100.0%
reporting jurisdiction36/36100.0%
industry36/36100.0%
Recorded products36/36100.0%
sub-industry36/36100.0%
Chain labels36/36100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts14
Distinct corresponding companies14
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs15

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Only generic operations vocabulary remains411.1%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters12.8%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

9 of this cohort’s 36 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (25.0%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs9099

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Power-equipment design must connect to manufacturing and assembly

The Power transmission and distribution equipment label covers 5 records (13.9% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Components or equipment with design-to-manufacturing fit documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Power Battery Formation Testing Keyword Candidate Study: 2; records in this cohort but outside that set: 34. The intersection/union ratio is 5.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with High Barrier Packaging Film Keyword Candidate Study: 1; records in this cohort but outside that set: 35. The intersection/union ratio is 2.6%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Global Science&Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.ShanghaiNext-generation information technology
RePower Technology Co., Ltd.ShenzhenNew-energy vehicles
Shenzhen Rspower Technology Co., Ltd.ShenzhenNew energy and power equipment
Henan Relations Co., Ltd.HenanNew energy and power equipment
Guangdong Hynn Technology Co., Ltd.GuangdongAdvanced equipment
Shandong Huatian Technology Group Co., Ltd.ShandongNew energy and power equipment
Shenzhen Greensheng Technology Co., Ltd.ShenzhenNew-energy vehicles
Shanghai Optech Science and Technology Co., Ltd.ShanghaiAdvanced equipment

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions