Regional and supply-chain research

New energy and power equipment / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study

New energy and power equipment / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study. A dated 51-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shanghai, contains 8 records (15.7% of this 51-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 43 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Next-generation information technology accounts for 45.1% here (23/51), compared with 4.8% in the parent set (100/2,072), an absolute gap of 40.3 percentage points.

16/51 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (31.4% of the cohort). The other 35 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
51510.3%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, New energy and power equipment, contains 2,072 records. This cohort contributes 51 (2.5%); 2,021 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 51 (0.3%); 19,246 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: New energy and power equipmentGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · Next-generation information technology23/51 · 45.1%100/2,072 · 4.8%+40.39.3477/2,021
sub-industry · Power-sector informatisation and energy management10/51 · 19.6%26/2,072 · 1.3%+18.415.6316/2,021
reporting jurisdiction · Shanghai8/51 · 15.7%91/2,072 · 4.4%+11.33.5783/2,021
reporting jurisdiction · Beijing8/51 · 15.7%96/2,072 · 4.6%+11.13.3988/2,021
sub-industry · New-energy operations, maintenance and services6/51 · 11.8%15/2,072 · 0.7%+11.016.259/2,021
industry · Advanced equipment13/51 · 25.5%703/2,072 · 33.9%-8.40.75690/2,021
industry · Producer services6/51 · 11.8%86/2,072 · 4.2%+7.62.8380/2,021
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu7/51 · 13.7%363/2,072 · 17.5%-3.80.78356/2,021

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Next-generation information technology covers 77/2,021 remaining records (3.8%), an absolute gap of 41.3 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 18 labels; the top 3 contain 23/51 records (45.1%).Other known labels contain 28 records.

For 51 records with known labels, the effective category count is 10.5, versus 18 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 8 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Shanghai815.7%
Beijing815.7%
Jiangsu713.7%
Sichuan47.8%
Guangdong47.8%
Zhejiang35.9%
Hubei35.9%
Jilin23.9%
Anhui23.9%
Henan23.9%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Beijing × Next-generation information technology, contains 5 records, or 62.5% of the 8 records carrying the Beijing label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
BeijingNext-generation information technology59.8%
ShanghaiNext-generation information technology47.8%
SichuanNext-generation information technology47.8%
JiangsuAdvanced equipment35.9%
ShanghaiNew-energy vehicles23.9%
ShanghaiAdvanced equipment23.9%
BeijingProducer services23.9%
GuangdongNext-generation information technology23.9%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 32 non-empty cells; the other 24 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name51/51100.0%
reporting jurisdiction51/51100.0%
industry51/51100.0%
Recorded products51/51100.0%
sub-industry51/51100.0%
Chain labels51/51100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts16
Distinct corresponding companies16
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs16

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording12.0%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains47.8%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

9 of this cohort’s 51 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs9099

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Power-equipment design must connect to manufacturing and assembly

The Power transmission, distribution and control equipment label covers 2 records (3.9% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Components or equipment with design-to-manufacturing fit documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Smart Energy Management Carbon Platform Keyword Candidate Study: 10; records in this cohort but outside that set: 41. The intersection/union ratio is 11.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Substation Automation Protection Control Keyword Candidate Study: 3; records in this cohort but outside that set: 48. The intersection/union ratio is 4.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Nanjing Guodian Nanzi Power Grid Automation Co., Ltd.JiangsuNext-generation information technology
Puhua Xunguang (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Fujian Tonglida Industrial Co., Ltd.FujianNext-generation information technology
Beijing QU Creative Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingProducer services
Guangzhou Yangxin Technology Research Co., Ltd.GuangdongProducer services
Beijing Retec New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingProducer services
Hangzhou Tpson Technology Co., Ltd.ZhejiangNew energy and power equipment
Energiedaten Technology (Shanghai) Co.,LtdShanghaiNext-generation information technology

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions