Food, agriculture and consumer products / Agricultural, consumer and everyday-use end products Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Zhejiang, contains 29 records (12.1% of this 239-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 210 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Light industry and textiles accounts for 83.3% here (199/239), compared with 75.8% in the parent set (210/277), an absolute gap of 7.5 percentage points.

120/239 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (50.2% of the cohort). The other 119 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Food, agriculture and consumer products, contains 277 records. This cohort contributes 239 (86.3%); 38 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 239 (1.2%); 19,058 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Light industry and textiles covers 11/38 remaining records (28.9%), an absolute gap of 54.3 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 34 labels; the top 3 contain 82/239 records (34.3%).Other known labels contain 157 records.

For 239 records with known labels, the effective category count is 15.3, versus 34 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 24 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Zhejiang × Light industry and textiles, contains 24 records, or 82.8% of the 29 records carrying the Zhejiang label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 66 non-empty cells; the other 58 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

40 of this cohort’s 239 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (16.7%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Consumer and everyday-use products / Food, agriculture and consumer products / Agricultural, consumer and everyday-use end products Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 113; records in this cohort but outside that set: 126. The intersection/union ratio is 47.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Textile Equipment Functional Fiber Keyword Candidate Study: 50; records in this cohort but outside that set: 189. The intersection/union ratio is 11.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.