Regional and supply-chain research

Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study

Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study. A dated 4,085-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 770 records (18.8% of this 4,085-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 3,315 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Instrumentation and testing equipment accounts for 17.1% here (700/4,085), compared with 15.7% in the parent set (719/4,590), an absolute gap of 1.5 percentage points.

1,628/4,085 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (39.9% of the cohort). The other 2,457 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
4,0854,08521.2%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation, contains 4,590 records. This cohort contributes 4,085 (89.0%); 505 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 4,085 (21.2%); 15,212 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Advanced equipment and industrial automationGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Instrumentation and testing equipment700/4,085 · 17.1%719/4,590 · 15.7%+1.51.0919/505
reporting jurisdiction · Shanghai171/4,085 · 4.2%234/4,590 · 5.1%-0.90.8263/505
sub-industry · Industrial robots92/4,085 · 2.3%142/4,590 · 3.1%-0.80.7350/505
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu770/4,085 · 18.8%836/4,590 · 18.2%+0.61.0366/505
sub-industry · General industrial equipment and automation364/4,085 · 8.9%381/4,590 · 8.3%+0.61.0717/505
reporting jurisdiction · Shenzhen256/4,085 · 6.3%313/4,590 · 6.8%-0.60.9257/505
reporting jurisdiction · Beijing153/4,085 · 3.7%191/4,590 · 4.2%-0.40.9038/505
industry · Advanced equipment2,907/4,085 · 71.2%3,283/4,590 · 71.5%-0.40.99376/505
industry · Biomedicine223/4,085 · 5.5%238/4,590 · 5.2%+0.31.0515/505
industry · Next-generation information technology496/4,085 · 12.1%568/4,590 · 12.4%-0.20.9872/505

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Instrumentation and testing equipment covers 19/505 remaining records (3.8%), an absolute gap of 13.4 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 34 labels; the top 3 contain 1,581/4,085 records (38.7%).Other known labels contain 2,504 records.

For 4,085 records with known labels, the effective category count is 12.8, versus 34 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 24 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Jiangsu77018.8%
Zhejiang50212.3%
Shandong3097.6%
Guangdong2857.0%
Shenzhen2566.3%
Anhui1734.2%
Shanghai1714.2%
Hubei1543.8%
Beijing1533.7%
Hunan1373.4%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 562 records, or 73.0% of the 770 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
JiangsuAdvanced equipment56213.8%
ZhejiangAdvanced equipment3899.5%
ShandongAdvanced equipment2385.8%
GuangdongAdvanced equipment1884.6%
ShenzhenAdvanced equipment1363.3%
AnhuiAdvanced equipment1233.0%
HubeiAdvanced equipment1072.6%
HebeiAdvanced equipment1042.5%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 176 non-empty cells; the other 168 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name4,085/4,085100.0%
reporting jurisdiction4,085/4,085100.0%
industry4,085/4,085100.0%
Recorded products4,085/4,085100.0%
sub-industry4,085/4,085100.0%
Chain labels4,085/4,085100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts1,628
Distinct corresponding companies1,628
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs1,672

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording2195.4%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains1192.9%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters90.2%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

997 of this cohort’s 4,085 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (24.4%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs99731966997

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Line delivery adds process-interface responsibilities

The Intelligent manufacturing line equipment label covers 156 records (3.8% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Integrated process lines with system-acceptance documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Advanced equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study: 2,907; records in this cohort but outside that set: 1,178. The intersection/union ratio is 71.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Robotics Keyword Candidate Study: 1,143; records in this cohort but outside that set: 2,942. The intersection/union ratio is 24.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Henan Taihang Quanli Heavy Industry Co., Ltd.HenanAdvanced equipment
Sichuan Yuanfang Hightech Equipment Parts Co., Ltd.SichuanAdvanced equipment
Shenzhen Maintex Intelligent Control Co., Ltd.ShenzhenAdvanced equipment
Shenzhen Megmeet Welding Technology Co., Ltd.ShenzhenProducer services
Jiangsu Luokai Mechanical & Electrical Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced equipment
Shenzhen Pacific Union Precision Manufacturing Co., Ltd.ShenzhenAdvanced equipment
Selm (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Okada Intelligence (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced equipment

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions