Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Beijing, contains 8 records (17.8% of this 45-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 37 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 53.3% here (24/45), compared with 71.5% in the parent set (3,283/4,590), an absolute gap of 18.2 percentage points.

15/45 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (33.3% of the cohort). The other 30 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation, contains 4,590 records. This cohort contributes 45 (1.0%); 4,545 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 45 (0.2%); 19,252 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 3,259/4,545 remaining records (71.7%), an absolute gap of 18.4 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 18 labels; the top 3 contain 20/45 records (44.4%).Other known labels contain 25 records.

For 45 records with known labels, the effective category count is 10.6, versus 18 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 8 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Beijing × Advanced equipment, contains 6 records, or 75.0% of the 8 records carrying the Beijing label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 27 non-empty cells; the other 19 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

7 of this cohort’s 45 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (15.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Line delivery adds process-interface responsibilities

The Industrial automation and smart production-line equipment label covers 6 records (13.3% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Integrated process lines with system-acceptance documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Smart Mine Unmanned Mining Keyword Candidate Study: 2; records in this cohort but outside that set: 43. The intersection/union ratio is 3.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Shanghai / Producer services Company Structure Study: 4; records in this cohort but outside that set: 41. The intersection/union ratio is 2.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.