Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Zhejiang, contains 33 records (12.3% of this 268-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 235 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Instrumentation and testing equipment accounts for 2.2% here (6/268), compared with 15.7% in the parent set (719/4,590), an absolute gap of 13.4 percentage points.

71/268 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (26.5% of the cohort). The other 197 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation, contains 4,590 records. This cohort contributes 268 (5.8%); 4,322 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 268 (1.4%); 19,029 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Instrumentation and testing equipment covers 713/4,322 remaining records (16.5%), an absolute gap of 14.3 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 31 labels; the top 3 contain 94/268 records (35.1%).Other known labels contain 174 records.

For 268 records with known labels, the effective category count is 13.0, versus 31 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 21 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Zhejiang × Advanced equipment, contains 26 records, or 78.8% of the 33 records carrying the Zhejiang label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 60 non-empty cells; the other 52 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

43 of this cohort’s 268 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (16.0%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Line delivery adds process-interface responsibilities

The Warehousing and logistics automation label covers 20 records (7.5% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Integrated process lines with system-acceptance documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Smart Logistics AGV Warehouse Keyword Candidate Study: 40; records in this cohort but outside that set: 228. The intersection/union ratio is 10.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Unmanned Systems Inspection Robots Keyword Candidate Study: 27; records in this cohort but outside that set: 241. The intersection/union ratio is 8.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.