Fine chemicals / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shandong, contains 11 records (25.0% of this 44-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 33 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced materials accounts for 22.7% here (10/44), compared with 52.1% in the parent set (411/789), an absolute gap of 29.4 percentage points.

19/44 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (43.2% of the cohort). The other 25 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Fine chemicals, contains 789 records. This cohort contributes 44 (5.6%); 745 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 44 (0.2%); 19,253 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced materials covers 401/745 remaining records (53.8%), an absolute gap of 31.1 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 15 labels; the top 3 contain 23/44 records (52.3%).Other known labels contain 21 records.

For 44 records with known labels, the effective category count is 7.9, versus 15 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 5 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Shandong × Producer services, contains 3 records, or 27.3% of the 11 records carrying the Shandong label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 32 non-empty cells; the other 24 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

1 records have a documented classification-consistency question. Original counts remain 44; excluding these records leaves 43 in the sensitivity calculation. The study does not reclassify firms or treat label conflicts as operating changes.

14 of this cohort’s 44 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (31.8%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Oilfield Drilling Completion Tools Keyword Candidate Study: 5; records in this cohort but outside that set: 39. The intersection/union ratio is 6.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Oil Gas Petrochemical Equipment Keyword Candidate Study: 11; records in this cohort but outside that set: 33. The intersection/union ratio is 6.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.