Electronic information and digital technology / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shenzhen, contains 72 records (34.8% of this 207-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 135 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Shenzhen accounts for 34.8% here (72/207), compared with 14.2% in the parent set (678/4,770), an absolute gap of 20.6 percentage points.

64/207 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (30.9% of the cohort). The other 143 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology, contains 4,770 records. This cohort contributes 207 (4.3%); 4,563 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 207 (1.1%); 19,090 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Shenzhen covers 606/4,563 remaining records (13.3%), an absolute gap of 21.5 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 23 labels; the top 3 contain 108/207 records (52.2%).Other known labels contain 99 records.

For 207 records with known labels, the effective category count is 6.4, versus 23 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 13 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Shenzhen × Next-generation information technology, contains 58 records, or 80.6% of the 72 records carrying the Shenzhen label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 42 non-empty cells; the other 34 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

33 of this cohort’s 207 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (15.9%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Check terminal direction separately from system delivery

The Computer and consumer-electronics hardware label covers 11 records (5.3% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Complete systems with use-specific delivery documentation; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Shenzhen / Electronic information and digital technology / Complete systems and use-case applications Company Structure Study: 72; records in this cohort but outside that set: 135. The intersection/union ratio is 34.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Smart Terminal Consumer Electronics Keyword Candidate Study: 37; records in this cohort but outside that set: 170. The intersection/union ratio is 8.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.