Regional and supply-chain research

High End Valves Control Valves Keyword Candidate Study

High End Valves Control Valves Keyword Candidate Study. A dated 43-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Zhejiang, contains 16 records (37.2% of this 43-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 27 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments accounts for 72.1% here (31/43), compared with 21.2% in the parent set (4,085/19,297), an absolute gap of 50.9 percentage points.

11/43 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (25.6% of the cohort). The other 32 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

2 keyword candidates match only a company name, with no matching term in recorded products or sub-industry fields. Product evidence is needed before treating these as operating businesses in this segment.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
43430.2%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 43 (0.2%); 19,254 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments31/43 · 72.1%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%+50.93.414,054/19,254
industry · Advanced equipment24/43 · 55.8%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%+30.32.194,894/19,254
reporting jurisdiction · Zhejiang16/43 · 37.2%1,840/19,297 · 9.5%+27.73.901,824/19,254
sub-industry · Pumps, valves and fluid control11/43 · 25.6%279/19,297 · 1.4%+24.117.69268/19,254
industry · Next-generation information technology5/43 · 11.6%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%-15.50.435,221/19,254
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Core components and digital hardware5/43 · 11.6%173/19,297 · 0.9%+10.712.97168/19,254
industry · Producer services6/43 · 14.0%954/19,297 · 4.9%+9.02.82948/19,254
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu7/43 · 16.3%3,025/19,297 · 15.7%+0.61.043,018/19,254

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments covers 4,054/19,254 remaining records (21.1%), an absolute gap of 51.0 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 16 labels; the top 3 contain 26/43 records (60.5%).Other known labels contain 17 records.

For 43 records with known labels, the effective category count is 5.4, versus 16 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 6 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Zhejiang1637.2%
Jiangsu716.3%
Shanghai37.0%
Shandong37.0%
Anhui24.7%
Hubei24.7%
Beijing12.3%
Xiamen12.3%
Sichuan12.3%
Dalian12.3%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Zhejiang × Advanced equipment, contains 10 records, or 62.5% of the 16 records carrying the Zhejiang label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
ZhejiangAdvanced equipment1023.3%
JiangsuAdvanced equipment511.6%
ZhejiangNext-generation information technology37.0%
ShandongAdvanced equipment24.7%
ZhejiangProducer services24.7%
ShanghaiNext-generation information technology12.3%
ShanghaiAdvanced materials12.3%
ShanghaiAdvanced equipment12.3%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 26 non-empty cells; the other 18 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name43/43100.0%
reporting jurisdiction43/43100.0%
industry43/43100.0%
Recorded products43/43100.0%
sub-industry43/43100.0%
Chain labels43/43100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts11
Distinct corresponding companies11
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs12

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording12.3%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Matched fieldCandidatesCohort share
Company name614.0%
Recorded products2865.1%
Sub-industry1534.9%

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “control valves” has the most matches: 20/43. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 4, 7 and 13 records respectively; the largest field is sub-industry label. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected query termCandidates/shareName matchesProduct fieldSub-industry
control valves20 · 46.5%4713

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

2 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

13 of this cohort’s 43 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (30.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs1301313

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Industrial Valve Actuator Control System Keyword Candidate Study: 29; records in this cohort but outside that set: 14. The intersection/union ratio is 53.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Pump Valve Fluid Control Keyword Candidate Study: 27; records in this cohort but outside that set: 16. The intersection/union ratio is 3.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Newton Fluid Technology Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced equipment
Zhejiang Zhongde Automatic Control Science and Technology Joint Stock Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced equipment
Wuxi Baoniu Valve Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced equipment
Vigus Hubei Fluid Technology Co., Ltd.HubeiProducer services
Chongqing Chuanyi Control Valve Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced equipment
Ningbo Texoon Brassworks Co., Ltd.NingboAdvanced materials
Wuxi FORCE & Torque Technology Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced equipment
Shanxi Avic Jinheng Technology Co., Ltd.ShanxiNew-energy vehicles

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions