Regional and supply-chain research

Industrial Software Keyword Candidate Study

Industrial Software Keyword Candidate Study. A dated 1,146-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Beijing, contains 299 records (26.1% of this 1,146-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 847 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded chain role label Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services accounts for 76.3% here (874/1,146), compared with 6.9% in the parent set (1,329/19,297), an absolute gap of 69.4 percentage points.

313/1,146 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (27.3% of the cohort). The other 833 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

1 keyword candidates match only a company name, with no matching term in recorded products or sub-industry fields. Product evidence is needed before treating these as operating businesses in this segment.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1,1461,1465.9%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 1,146 (5.9%); 18,151 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services874/1,146 · 76.3%1,329/19,297 · 6.9%+69.411.07455/18,151
industry · Next-generation information technology1,049/1,146 · 91.5%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%+64.53.384,177/18,151
industry · Advanced equipment21/1,146 · 1.8%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%-23.70.074,897/18,151
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments21/1,146 · 1.8%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%-19.30.094,064/18,151
reporting jurisdiction · Beijing299/1,146 · 26.1%1,351/19,297 · 7.0%+19.13.731,052/18,151
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu103/1,146 · 9.0%3,025/19,297 · 15.7%-6.70.572,922/18,151
chain role · Electronic information and digital technology / Complete systems and use-case applications80/1,146 · 7.0%207/19,297 · 1.1%+5.96.51127/18,151
sub-industry · Electronic assemblies and systems integration8/1,146 · 0.7%1,188/19,297 · 6.2%-5.50.111,180/18,151
reporting jurisdiction · Shenzhen127/1,146 · 11.1%1,398/19,297 · 7.2%+3.81.531,271/18,151
reporting jurisdiction · Shandong47/1,146 · 4.1%1,217/19,297 · 6.3%-2.20.651,170/18,151

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services covers 455/18,151 remaining records (2.5%), an absolute gap of 73.8 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 30 labels; the top 3 contain 529/1,146 records (46.2%).Other known labels contain 617 records.

For 1,146 records with known labels, the effective category count is 9.0, versus 30 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 20 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Beijing29926.1%
Shenzhen12711.1%
Jiangsu1039.0%
Zhejiang857.4%
Guangdong746.5%
Shanghai736.4%
Sichuan494.3%
Shandong474.1%
Hubei474.1%
Anhui363.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Beijing × Next-generation information technology, contains 283 records, or 94.6% of the 299 records carrying the Beijing label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
BeijingNext-generation information technology28324.7%
ShenzhenNext-generation information technology1069.2%
JiangsuNext-generation information technology948.2%
ZhejiangNext-generation information technology736.4%
GuangdongNext-generation information technology696.0%
ShanghaiNext-generation information technology635.5%
SichuanNext-generation information technology484.2%
ShandongNext-generation information technology433.8%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 65 non-empty cells; the other 57 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name1,146/1,146100.0%
reporting jurisdiction1,146/1,146100.0%
industry1,146/1,146100.0%
Recorded products1,146/1,146100.0%
sub-industry1,146/1,146100.0%
Chain labels1,146/1,146100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts313
Distinct corresponding companies313
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs330

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording121.0%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains302.6%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters40.3%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Matched fieldCandidatesCohort share
Company name70.6%
Recorded products1028.9%
Sub-industry1,09795.7%

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “industrial software” has the most matches: 941/1,146. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 3, 29 and 927 records respectively; the largest field is sub-industry label. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected query termCandidates/shareName matchesProduct fieldSub-industry
industrial software941 · 82.1%329927
industrial internet198 · 17.3%338165
digital twins30 · 2.6%1290

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

1 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

200 of this cohort’s 1,146 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.5%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs2007193200

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Workflow coverage matters more than a single market label

The Industrial software and information services label covers 906 records (79.1% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Workflow-specific software outputs and interface documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Industrial software and information services / Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 807; records in this cohort but outside that set: 339. The intersection/union ratio is 70.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study: 874; records in this cohort but outside that set: 272. The intersection/union ratio is 54.6%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Huada Tianyuan(Beijing)Science and Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Guangzhou Robustel Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
Nanjing Sciyon Wisdom Technology Group Co., Ltd.JiangsuNext-generation information technology
Beijing Standard World Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Shenzhen Yisheng Technology Co., Ltd.ShenzhenNext-generation information technology
Anhui Conch Information Technology Engineering Co., Ltd.AnhuiNext-generation information technology
Tianjin Shenzhou General Data Technology Co., Ltd.TianjinNext-generation information technology
Leador Spatial Information Technology CorporationHubeiNext-generation information technology

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions