Regional and supply-chain research

Machine Tool Cutting Tool Fixture Keyword Candidate Study

Machine Tool Cutting Tool Fixture Keyword Candidate Study. A dated 48-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Sichuan, contains 6 records (12.5% of this 48-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 42 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments accounts for 58.3% here (28/48), compared with 21.2% in the parent set (4,085/19,297), an absolute gap of 37.2 percentage points.

20/48 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (41.7% of the cohort). The other 28 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

3 keyword candidates match only a company name, with no matching term in recorded products or sub-industry fields. Product evidence is needed before treating these as operating businesses in this segment.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
48480.2%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 48 (0.2%); 19,249 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments28/48 · 58.3%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%+37.22.764,057/19,249
industry · Advanced equipment24/48 · 50.0%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%+24.51.964,894/19,249
sub-industry · Instrumentation and testing equipment11/48 · 22.9%719/19,297 · 3.7%+19.26.15708/19,249
industry · Advanced materials14/48 · 29.2%3,381/19,297 · 17.5%+11.61.663,367/19,249
sub-industry · Metals and alloy materials6/48 · 12.5%284/19,297 · 1.5%+11.08.49278/19,249
chain role · Advanced materials / Basic and process materials12/48 · 25.0%2,854/19,297 · 14.8%+10.21.692,842/19,249
reporting jurisdiction · Sichuan6/48 · 12.5%612/19,297 · 3.2%+9.33.94606/19,249
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu5/48 · 10.4%3,025/19,297 · 15.7%-5.30.663,020/19,249
reporting jurisdiction · Shandong5/48 · 10.4%1,217/19,297 · 6.3%+4.11.651,212/19,249

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments covers 4,057/19,249 remaining records (21.1%), an absolute gap of 37.3 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 20 labels; the top 3 contain 16/48 records (33.3%).Other known labels contain 32 records.

For 48 records with known labels, the effective category count is 13.6, versus 20 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 10 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Sichuan612.5%
Shandong510.4%
Jiangsu510.4%
Zhejiang48.3%
Shenzhen48.3%
Hunan48.3%
Ningbo36.2%
Guangdong36.2%
Liaoning24.2%
Chongqing24.2%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Sichuan × Advanced equipment, contains 5 records, or 83.3% of the 6 records carrying the Sichuan label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
SichuanAdvanced equipment510.4%
ShandongAdvanced equipment36.2%
HunanAdvanced equipment36.2%
NingboAdvanced materials24.2%
ShandongNew-energy vehicles24.2%
JiangsuAdvanced materials24.2%
JiangsuAdvanced equipment24.2%
ZhejiangAdvanced materials24.2%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 33 non-empty cells; the other 25 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name48/48100.0%
reporting jurisdiction48/48100.0%
industry48/48100.0%
Recorded products48/48100.0%
sub-industry48/48100.0%
Chain labels48/48100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts20
Distinct corresponding companies20
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs22

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording12.1%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Matched fieldCandidatesCohort share
Company name714.6%
Recorded products4389.6%
Sub-industry48.3%

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “cutting tools” has the most matches: 31/48. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 7, 26 and 4 records respectively; the largest field is product field. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected query termCandidates/shareName matchesProduct fieldSub-industry
cutting tools31 · 64.6%7264

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

3 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

15 of this cohort’s 48 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (31.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs1501515

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Equipment performance must refer to a processing object

The CNC machine tools and machining equipment label covers 1 records (2.1% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Machines or manufacturing cells for defined processes; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Superhard Materials Cutting Tools Abrasives Keyword Candidate Study: 34; records in this cohort but outside that set: 14. The intersection/union ratio is 29.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Robot End Effector Gripper Fixture Keyword Candidate Study: 14; records in this cohort but outside that set: 34. The intersection/union ratio is 29.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Dongguan Fu Brandy Tools Co., Ltd.HunanAdvanced equipment
Luoyang Jiujiu Technology Co., Ltd.HenanNext-generation information technology
Hei Chow PRECISION Tools Co., Ltd.ShenzhenAdvanced equipment
Sichuan Shen Gong Carbide Knives Co., Ltd.SichuanAdvanced equipment
EST Tools Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced equipment
Heye Special Steel Co., Ltd.HebeiAdvanced materials
CHONG QING Kanzasin Technology Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Shandong Baichang Automotive Parts Co., Ltd.ShandongNew-energy vehicles

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

PagePresentation
Dongguan Fu Brandy Tools Co., Ltd.Company data profile
Luoyang Jiujiu Technology Co., Ltd.Company data profile
Hei Chow PRECISION Tools Co., Ltd.Company data profile
Sichuan Shen Gong Carbide Knives Co., Ltd.Company data profile
EST Tools Co., Ltd.Company data profile
Heye Special Steel Co., Ltd.Company data profile

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions