Regional and supply-chain research

Plastic Packaging Bottle Cap Molded Products Keyword Candidate Study

Plastic Packaging Bottle Cap Molded Products Keyword Candidate Study. A dated 47-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Zhejiang, contains 8 records (17.0% of this 47-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 39 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded chain role label Advanced materials / Basic and process materials accounts for 63.8% here (30/47), compared with 14.8% in the parent set (2,854/19,297), an absolute gap of 49.0 percentage points.

18/47 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (38.3% of the cohort). The other 29 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

9 keyword candidates match only a company name, with no matching term in recorded products or sub-industry fields. Product evidence is needed before treating these as operating businesses in this segment.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
47470.2%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 47 (0.2%); 19,250 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Advanced materials / Basic and process materials30/47 · 63.8%2,854/19,297 · 14.8%+49.04.322,824/19,250
industry · Advanced materials31/47 · 66.0%3,381/19,297 · 17.5%+48.43.763,350/19,250
sub-industry · Polymers and composite materials11/47 · 23.4%185/19,297 · 1.0%+22.424.41174/19,250
industry · Advanced equipment5/47 · 10.6%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%-14.80.424,913/19,250
sub-industry · Modified plastics / engineering plastics6/47 · 12.8%86/19,297 · 0.4%+12.328.6480/19,250
sub-industry · Automotive structural parts and components5/47 · 10.6%388/19,297 · 2.0%+8.65.29383/19,250
reporting jurisdiction · Hebei5/47 · 10.6%500/19,297 · 2.6%+8.04.11495/19,250
reporting jurisdiction · Zhejiang8/47 · 17.0%1,840/19,297 · 9.5%+7.51.791,832/19,250
reporting jurisdiction · Hubei5/47 · 10.6%866/19,297 · 4.5%+6.22.37861/19,250
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu6/47 · 12.8%3,025/19,297 · 15.7%-2.90.813,019/19,250

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Advanced materials / Basic and process materials covers 2,824/19,250 remaining records (14.7%), an absolute gap of 49.2 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 17 labels; the top 3 contain 19/47 records (40.4%).Other known labels contain 28 records.

For 47 records with known labels, the effective category count is 10.8, versus 17 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 7 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Zhejiang817.0%
Jiangsu612.8%
Hebei510.6%
Hubei510.6%
Shandong48.5%
Anhui36.4%
Guangdong36.4%
Henan36.4%
Ningbo24.3%
Shanghai12.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Zhejiang × Advanced materials, contains 6 records, or 75.0% of the 8 records carrying the Zhejiang label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
ZhejiangAdvanced materials612.8%
HebeiAdvanced materials48.5%
HubeiAdvanced materials48.5%
JiangsuAdvanced materials36.4%
NingboAdvanced materials24.3%
AnhuiAdvanced materials24.3%
ShandongNext-generation information technology24.3%
ShandongAdvanced materials24.3%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 27 non-empty cells; the other 19 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name47/47100.0%
reporting jurisdiction47/47100.0%
industry47/47100.0%
Recorded products47/47100.0%
sub-industry47/47100.0%
Chain labels47/47100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts18
Distinct corresponding companies18
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs20

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Matched fieldCandidatesCohort share
Company name919.1%
Recorded products3778.7%
Sub-industry24.3%

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “plastic products” has the most matches: 29/47. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 8, 21 and 0 records respectively; the largest field is product field. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected query termCandidates/shareName matchesProduct fieldSub-industry
plastic products29 · 61.7%8210

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

9 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

8 of this cohort’s 47 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.0%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs8178

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Validate packaging by use; circularity priorities are not performance results

The Tinplate packaging containers label covers 1 records (2.1% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Paper or plastic packaging or materials with defined uses and composition; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Injection Extrusion Plastic Machinery Keyword Candidate Study: 12; records in this cohort but outside that set: 35. The intersection/union ratio is 10.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Rubber Plastic Modified Materials Keyword Candidate Study: 35; records in this cohort but outside that set: 12. The intersection/union ratio is 8.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
The Taihu Lake Huaqiang Technology Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced materials
Taizhou Tianda Yuan Technology Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced materials
ZheJiang SanYou Plastic Industry Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced materials
Shenzhen Huate Packing Co., Ltd.ShenzhenAdvanced equipment
Jiangsu Songshang Technology Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced materials
Henan Fangyi Sealing Technology Co., Ltd.HenanAdvanced equipment
Ningbo Energy Moulding Plastic Technology Co., Ltd.NingboAdvanced materials
Jiangsu Junhua Special Polymer Materials Co., Ltd.JiangsuAdvanced materials

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions