Hebei / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced equipment, contains 104 records (77.6% of this 134-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 30 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Construction and heavy machinery accounts for 13.4% here (18/134), compared with 4.4% in the parent set (179/4,085), an absolute gap of 9.1 percentage points.

65/134 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (48.5% of the cohort). The other 69 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 4,085 records. This cohort contributes 134 (3.3%); 3,951 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Hebei, contains 500 records. This cohort contributes 134 (26.8%); 366 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Construction and heavy machinery covers 161/3,951 remaining records (4.1%), an absolute gap of 9.4 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 8 labels; the top 3 contain 124/134 records (92.5%).Other known labels contain 10 records.

For 134 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.6, versus 8 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

40 of this cohort’s 134 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (29.9%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

The 2025 macro context for Hebei uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Line delivery adds process-interface responsibilities

The Industrial automation and smart production-line equipment label covers 3 records (2.2% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Integrated process lines with system-acceptance documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Hebei Company Structure Study: 134; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 26.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Hebei / 4th batch Company Structure Study: 31; records in this cohort but outside that set: 103. The intersection/union ratio is 12.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.