Regional and supply-chain research

Beijing / Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Company Structure Study

Beijing / Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Company Structure Study. A dated 355-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Next-generation information technology, contains 335 records (94.4% of this 355-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 20 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Industrial software and information services accounts for 66.8% here (237/355), compared with 60.7% in the parent set (807/1,329), an absolute gap of 6.0 percentage points.

55/355 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (15.5% of the cohort). The other 300 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
3553551.8%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services, contains 1,329 records. This cohort contributes 355 (26.7%); 974 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Beijing, contains 1,351 records. This cohort contributes 355 (26.3%); 996 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial servicesGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Industrial software and information services237/355 · 66.8%807/1,329 · 60.7%+6.01.10570/974
sub-industry · Network and information security41/355 · 11.5%77/1,329 · 5.8%+5.81.9936/974
sub-industry · Artificial intelligence and data intelligence15/355 · 4.2%26/1,329 · 2.0%+2.32.1611/974
industry · Next-generation information technology335/355 · 94.4%1,225/1,329 · 92.2%+2.21.02890/974
industry · Producer services16/355 · 4.5%76/1,329 · 5.7%-1.20.7960/974

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Industrial software and information services covers 570/974 remaining records (58.5%), an absolute gap of 8.2 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full industry distribution has 4 labels; the top 3 contain 354/355 records (99.7%).Other known labels contain 1 records.

For 355 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.1, versus 4 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Next-generation information technology33594.4%
Producer services164.5%
Advanced equipment30.8%
Biomedicine10.3%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name355/355100.0%
reporting jurisdiction355/355100.0%
industry355/355100.0%
Recorded products355/355100.0%
sub-industry355/355100.0%
Chain labels355/355100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts55
Distinct corresponding companies55
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs59

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording41.1%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains102.8%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters10.3%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

73 of this cohort’s 355 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (20.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs7337073

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Beijing uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Beijing Company Archive Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Component records require interface-level evidence

The Semiconductors and integrated circuits label covers 2 records (0.6% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Components or modules with application specifications; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Beijing / Next-generation information technology Company Structure Study: 335; records in this cohort but outside that set: 20. The intersection/union ratio is 52.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Next-generation information technology / Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study: 335; records in this cohort but outside that set: 20. The intersection/union ratio is 26.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Huada Tianyuan(Beijing)Science and Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing Standard World Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing Shudu Information Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing Bailongma Yunxing Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing E-Credence Information Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing Dingxingda Information Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Changyang Technology(Beijing) Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Beijing Zhongyi Yuetai Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions