Regional and supply-chain research

Beijing / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Company Structure Study

Beijing / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Company Structure Study. A dated 68-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced materials, contains 59 records (86.8% of this 68-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 9 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Electronic and functional materials accounts for 8.8% here (6/68), compared with 0.9% in the parent set (26/2,854), an absolute gap of 7.9 percentage points.

11/68 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (16.2% of the cohort). The other 57 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
68680.4%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 2,854 records. This cohort contributes 68 (2.4%); 2,786 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Beijing, contains 1,351 records. This cohort contributes 68 (5.0%); 1,283 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Advanced materials / Basic and process materialsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Electronic and functional materials6/68 · 8.8%26/2,854 · 0.9%+7.99.6920/2,786
industry · Advanced materials59/68 · 86.8%2,664/2,854 · 93.3%-6.60.932,605/2,786
sub-industry · Functional materials and advanced-material platforms27/68 · 39.7%1,299/2,854 · 45.5%-5.80.871,272/2,786
industry · Producer services5/68 · 7.4%51/2,854 · 1.8%+5.64.1146/2,786
sub-industry · Rare earths and specialty metals5/68 · 7.4%93/2,854 · 3.3%+4.12.2688/2,786

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Electronic and functional materials covers 20/2,786 remaining records (0.7%), an absolute gap of 8.1 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full industry distribution has 3 labels; the top 3 contain 68/68 records (100.0%).These labels cover all records with known labels.

For 68 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.3, versus 3 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Advanced materials5986.8%
Producer services57.4%
Next-generation information technology45.9%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name68/68100.0%
reporting jurisdiction68/68100.0%
industry68/68100.0%
Recorded products68/68100.0%
sub-industry68/68100.0%
Chain labels68/68100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts11
Distinct corresponding companies11
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs11

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording11.5%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains34.4%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

15 of this cohort’s 68 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (22.1%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs1501515

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Beijing uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Beijing Company Archive Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Material delivery requires stable-production evidence

The Functional materials and advanced-material platforms label covers 27 records (39.7% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Materials of defined composition and form with batch documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Beijing / 4th batch Company Structure Study: 20; records in this cohort but outside that set: 48. The intersection/union ratio is 5.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Beijing Company Archive Study: 68; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 5.0%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
First New Material Technology Development Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials
Beijing Zhongkuang Dongfang Mining Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials
Tonsan Adhesive,inc.BeijingAdvanced materials
Beijing Protech New Material Science Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials
Sanhuan Magnet Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingNext-generation information technology
Ti Fang Zhi Gan (Chongqing) Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials
Beijing Jike Guochuang Lightweight Science Research Institute Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials
Megatronix(Beijing)Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingAdvanced materials

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions