Regional and supply-chain research

Chongqing / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Company Structure Study

Chongqing / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Company Structure Study. A dated 62-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced materials, contains 61 records (98.4% of this 62-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 1 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Metals and alloy materials accounts for 17.7% here (11/62), compared with 10.0% in the parent set (284/2,854), an absolute gap of 7.8 percentage points.

26/62 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (41.9% of the cohort). The other 36 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
62620.3%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 2,854 records. This cohort contributes 62 (2.2%); 2,792 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Chongqing, contains 391 records. This cohort contributes 62 (15.9%); 329 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Advanced materials / Basic and process materialsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Metals and alloy materials11/62 · 17.7%284/2,854 · 10.0%+7.81.78273/2,792
sub-industry · Specialty glass and quartz5/62 · 8.1%57/2,854 · 2.0%+6.14.0452/2,792
industry · Advanced materials61/62 · 98.4%2,664/2,854 · 93.3%+5.01.052,603/2,792
sub-industry · Polymers and composite materials5/62 · 8.1%183/2,854 · 6.4%+1.71.26178/2,792

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Metals and alloy materials covers 273/2,792 remaining records (9.8%), an absolute gap of 8.0 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full industry distribution has 2 labels; the top 2 contain 62/62 records (100.0%).These labels cover all records with known labels.

For 62 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.0, versus 2 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Advanced materials6198.4%
Next-generation information technology11.6%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name62/62100.0%
reporting jurisdiction62/62100.0%
industry62/62100.0%
Recorded products62/62100.0%
sub-industry62/62100.0%
Chain labels62/62100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts26
Distinct corresponding companies26
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs32

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Only generic operations vocabulary remains11.6%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

12 of this cohort’s 62 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (19.4%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs1201212

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Chongqing uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Chongqing Company Structure Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Material delivery requires stable-production evidence

The Functional materials and advanced-material platforms label covers 29 records (46.8% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Materials of defined composition and form with batch documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Chongqing Company Structure Study: 62; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 15.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Chongqing / 4th batch Company Structure Study: 21; records in this cohort but outside that set: 41. The intersection/union ratio is 11.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Chongqing Jian TAO Aluminum Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Chongqing Longjian METAL Manufacturing Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Ghong Xinmeiyu BOYANG Aluminium Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Gettel Yunyang Plastic Industry Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Chongqing Research BETTER Science & Technology Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Chongqing Sulian Plastic Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Chongqing Senqianye New Material Technology Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials
Chongqing Yuhua New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.ChongqingAdvanced materials

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions