Guangdong / Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Next-generation information technology, contains 85 records (96.6% of this 88-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 3 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Industrial software and information services accounts for 52.3% here (46/88), compared with 60.7% in the parent set (807/1,329), an absolute gap of 8.4 percentage points.

15/88 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (17.0% of the cohort). The other 73 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services, contains 1,329 records. This cohort contributes 88 (6.6%); 1,241 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Guangdong, contains 1,382 records. This cohort contributes 88 (6.4%); 1,294 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Industrial software and information services covers 761/1,241 remaining records (61.3%), an absolute gap of 9.0 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 3 labels; the top 3 contain 88/88 records (100.0%).These labels cover all records with known labels.

For 88 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.1, versus 3 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

24 of this cohort’s 88 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (27.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

The 2025 macro context for Guangdong uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Shared records with Guangdong / Next-generation information technology Company Structure Study: 85; records in this cohort but outside that set: 3. The intersection/union ratio is 18.0%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Guangdong / Next-generation information technology / 5th batch Company Structure Study: 24; records in this cohort but outside that set: 64. The intersection/union ratio is 11.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.