Guangdong / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Next-generation information technology, contains 280 records (90.3% of this 310-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 30 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Next-generation information technology accounts for 14.8% here (46/310), compared with 3.1% in the parent set (98/3,137), an absolute gap of 11.7 percentage points.

95/310 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (30.6% of the cohort). The other 215 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware, contains 3,137 records. This cohort contributes 310 (9.9%); 2,827 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Guangdong, contains 1,382 records. This cohort contributes 310 (22.4%); 1,072 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Next-generation information technology covers 52/2,827 remaining records (1.8%), an absolute gap of 13.0 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 9 labels; the top 3 contain 300/310 records (96.8%).Other known labels contain 10 records.

For 310 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.2, versus 9 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

70 of this cohort’s 310 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (22.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

The 2025 macro context for Guangdong uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Component records require interface-level evidence

The Electronic assemblies and systems integration label covers 103 records (33.2% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Components or modules with application specifications; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Guangdong / Next-generation information technology Company Structure Study: 280; records in this cohort but outside that set: 30. The intersection/union ratio is 56.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Guangdong Company Archive Study: 310; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 22.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.