Jiangsu / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced equipment, contains 562 records (73.0% of this 770-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 208 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label General industrial equipment and automation accounts for 11.6% here (89/770), compared with 8.9% in the parent set (364/4,085), an absolute gap of 2.6 percentage points.

459/770 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (59.6% of the cohort). The other 311 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 4,085 records. This cohort contributes 770 (18.8%); 3,315 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Jiangsu, contains 3,025 records. This cohort contributes 770 (25.5%); 2,255 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label General industrial equipment and automation covers 275/3,315 remaining records (8.3%), an absolute gap of 3.3 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 8 labels; the top 3 contain 698/770 records (90.6%).Other known labels contain 72 records.

For 770 records with known labels, the effective category count is 1.8, versus 8 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

210 of this cohort’s 770 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (27.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

The 2025 macro context for Jiangsu uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Line delivery adds process-interface responsibilities

The Intelligent manufacturing line equipment label covers 38 records (4.9% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Integrated process lines with system-acceptance documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Jiangsu / Advanced equipment Company Structure Study: 562; records in this cohort but outside that set: 208. The intersection/union ratio is 51.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Jiangsu Company Archive Study: 770; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 25.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.