Regional and supply-chain research

Yunnan Company Structure Study

Yunnan Company Structure Study. A dated 119-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced materials, contains 41 records (34.5% of this 119-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 78 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced materials accounts for 34.5% here (41/119), compared with 17.5% in the parent set (3,381/19,297), an absolute gap of 16.9 percentage points.

25/119 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (21.0% of the cohort). The other 94 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1191190.6%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 119 (0.6%); 19,178 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · Advanced materials41/119 · 34.5%3,381/19,297 · 17.5%+16.91.973,340/19,178
industry · Next-generation information technology14/119 · 11.8%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%-15.30.435,212/19,178
chain role · Advanced materials / Basic and process materials33/119 · 27.7%2,854/19,297 · 14.8%+12.91.882,821/19,178
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments14/119 · 11.8%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%-9.40.564,071/19,178
chain role · Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware9/119 · 7.6%3,137/19,297 · 16.3%-8.70.473,128/19,178
industry · Advanced equipment24/119 · 20.2%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%-5.30.794,894/19,178
industry · New energy and power equipment10/119 · 8.4%757/19,297 · 3.9%+4.52.14747/19,178
sub-industry · Cables and conductors6/119 · 5.0%115/19,297 · 0.6%+4.48.46109/19,178
sub-industry · Advanced chemicals6/119 · 5.0%307/19,297 · 1.6%+3.53.17301/19,178
sub-industry · Functional materials and advanced-material platforms12/119 · 10.1%1,300/19,297 · 6.7%+3.31.501,288/19,178

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced materials covers 3,340/19,178 remaining records (17.4%), an absolute gap of 17.0 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full industry distribution has 10 labels; the top 3 contain 79/119 records (66.4%).Other known labels contain 40 records.

For 119 records with known labels, the effective category count is 5.1, versus 10 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Advanced materials4134.5%
Advanced equipment2420.2%
Next-generation information technology1411.8%
Biomedicine1310.9%
New energy and power equipment108.4%
Producer services65.0%
Energy conservation and environmental protection43.4%
Advanced chemicals43.4%
Light industry and textiles21.7%
New-energy vehicles10.8%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Advanced materials × Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 32 records, or 78.0% of the 41 records carrying the Advanced materials label.

industrychain roleIntersection recordsCohort share
Advanced materialsAdvanced materials / Basic and process materials3226.9%
BiomedicineBiomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications108.4%
Advanced equipmentAdvanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments108.4%
New energy and power equipmentNew energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications97.6%
Next-generation information technologyElectronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware75.9%
Advanced equipmentNew energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications65.0%
Advanced materialsFine chemicals / Basic and process materials43.4%
Advanced chemicalsFine chemicals / Basic and process materials43.4%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 33 non-empty cells; the other 25 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name119/119100.0%
reporting jurisdiction119/119100.0%
industry119/119100.0%
Recorded products119/119100.0%
sub-industry119/119100.0%
Chain labels119/119100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts25
Distinct corresponding companies25
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs25

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording32.5%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

33 of this cohort’s 119 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (27.7%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs3323133
All list records in the same reporting jurisdiction69383169

The two rows are different sets; subtraction does not establish gaps or relocation. List rows are not new companies or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Provincial context and cohort interpretation

The provincial macro sources below use a different denominator from this 119-record archive cohort; they do not establish individual operating results.

How should power-generation structure be separated from product-level green claims as materials and battery-related industries grow?

In 2025, the combined value added of Yunnan’s silicon-photovoltaic, green-aluminium and new energy battery industries grew by 16.9%. Clean energy represented 87.6% of electricity generated within the industrial above-designated-size scope. These provincial aggregates do not certify any individual company’s electricity source or products as green. [1]

Interpretation and test conditions

Yunnan reports combined value-added growth for silicon-photovoltaics, green aluminium and new-energy batteries, alongside the clean-energy share of industrial generation. One combines industries; the other describes power production. Separate materials and battery stages and retain energy context as a distinct condition. [1]

Verify each material firm's processes, equipment and end uses. A high provincial clean-generation share does not establish its purchased electricity, energy consumption or product carbon footprint. Location alone cannot confer green certification or a low-carbon price premium. [1]

Compare product forms and city distributions for silicon-related materials, aluminium processing and battery records, then check energy, performance and use evidence. Where the source gives only combined growth, do not allocate it to individual industries or estimate their contributions from firm counts. [1]

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Cables and conductors / New energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 6; records in this cohort but outside that set: 113. The intersection/union ratio is 2.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Industrial Catalysts Adsorbents Keyword Candidate Study: 5; records in this cohort but outside that set: 114. The intersection/union ratio is 2.6%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Yunnan Zhengbang Technology Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced chemicals
Yunnan Yunkai Electric Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced equipment
QuakeSafe Technologies Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced equipment
Yuxi Walvax Biotechnology Co., Ltd.YunnanBiomedicine
Xin Lian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.YunnanEnergy conservation and environmental protection
Yunnan Tai Biao CNC Machine Tool Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced equipment
Yunnan Zhongxuan Liquid Metal Technology Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced materials
Yunnan Yuxi Zhonghui Electric Power Equipment Co., Ltd.YunnanAdvanced equipment

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions

Sources cited on this page

  1. Yunnan: Statistical Communiqué on National Economic and Social Development in 2025 · 2026-04-01