Regional and supply-chain research

Beijing / Biomedicine Company Structure Study

Beijing / Biomedicine Company Structure Study. A dated 164-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded chain role, Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 154 records (93.9% of this 164-record cohort). Companies may carry multiple labels in this dimension; participation rates are not additive market shares.

The recorded chain role label Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications accounts for 93.9% here (154/164), compared with 75.1% in the parent set (1,292/1,721), an absolute gap of 18.8 percentage points.

24/164 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (14.6% of the cohort). The other 140 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1641640.8%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Biomedicine, contains 1,721 records. This cohort contributes 164 (9.5%); 1,557 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Beijing, contains 1,351 records. This cohort contributes 164 (12.1%); 1,187 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: BiomedicineGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications154/164 · 93.9%1,292/1,721 · 75.1%+18.81.251,138/1,557
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments6/164 · 3.7%223/1,721 · 13.0%-9.30.28217/1,557
sub-industry · Advanced medical devices49/164 · 29.9%609/1,721 · 35.4%-5.50.84560/1,557
sub-industry · In vitro diagnostics11/164 · 6.7%30/1,721 · 1.7%+5.03.8519/1,557
sub-industry · Chemical drugs and formulations8/164 · 4.9%143/1,721 · 8.3%-3.40.59135/1,557

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications covers 1,138/1,557 remaining records (73.1%), an absolute gap of 20.8 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications15493.9%
Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments63.7%
New energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications10.6%
Automotive and transport equipment / Process equipment and inspection instruments10.6%
Electronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services10.6%
Fine chemicals / Process equipment and inspection instruments10.6%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name164/164100.0%
reporting jurisdiction164/164100.0%
industry164/164100.0%
Recorded products164/164100.0%
sub-industry164/164100.0%
Chain labels164/164100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts24
Distinct corresponding companies24
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs26

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording21.2%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains10.6%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

30 of this cohort’s 164 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (18.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs3022830

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Beijing uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Beijing Company Archive Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Drug-production leads need validation and change records

The Chemical drugs and formulations label covers 8 records (4.9% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Defined pharmaceutical-production or testing services with quality documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Beijing / Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications Company Structure Study: 154; records in this cohort but outside that set: 10. The intersection/union ratio is 91.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Beijing Company Archive Study: 164; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 12.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions