Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.
Research findings
Comparative structure study
The largest recorded chain role, Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 185 records (75.2% of this 246-record cohort). Companies may carry multiple labels in this dimension; participation rates are not additive market shares.
The recorded sub-industry label Advanced medical devices accounts for 45.5% here (112/246), compared with 35.4% in the parent set (609/1,721), an absolute gap of 10.1 percentage points.
157/246 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (63.8% of the cohort). The other 89 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.
| Company cohort | Directly linked pages | Share of public archive | Archive date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 246 | 246 | 1.3% | 2026-10-16 |
An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.
Comparable sets and compositional differences
The parent set, Biomedicine, contains 1,721 records. This cohort contributes 246 (14.3%); 1,475 records remain after excluding it.
The parent set, Jiangsu, contains 3,025 records. This cohort contributes 246 (8.1%); 2,779 records remain after excluding it.
| Category | Cohort count/base | Reference: Biomedicine | Gap (pp) | Representation ratio | Rest count/base |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sub-industry · Advanced medical devices | 112/246 · 45.5% | 609/1,721 · 35.4% | +10.1 | 1.29 | 497/1,475 |
| sub-industry · Biomedicine | 82/246 · 33.3% | 667/1,721 · 38.8% | -5.4 | 0.86 | 585/1,475 |
| chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments | 39/246 · 15.9% | 223/1,721 · 13.0% | +2.9 | 1.22 | 184/1,475 |
| sub-industry · Chemical drugs and formulations | 18/246 · 7.3% | 143/1,721 · 8.3% | -1.0 | 0.88 | 125/1,475 |
| chain role · Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications | 185/246 · 75.2% | 1,292/1,721 · 75.1% | +0.1 | 1.00 | 1,107/1,475 |
Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.
Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Advanced medical devices covers 497/1,475 remaining records (33.7%), an absolute gap of 11.8 percentage points from this cohort.
Concentration and cross-sectional structure
The table shows ten labels; 4 others are included in the calculations above.
| Recorded label | Records | Share of cohort |
|---|---|---|
| Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications | 185 | 75.2% |
| Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments | 39 | 15.9% |
| Automotive and transport equipment / Process equipment and inspection instruments | 4 | 1.6% |
| New energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications | 3 | 1.2% |
| Advanced materials / Basic and process materials | 2 | 0.8% |
| Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware | 2 | 0.8% |
| Biomedicine and medical devices / Process equipment and inspection instruments | 2 | 0.8% |
| Biomedicine and medical devices / Digital software and industrial services | 2 | 0.8% |
| Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials | 2 | 0.8% |
| Biomedicine and medical devices / Basic and process materials | 1 | 0.4% |
Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.
Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions
| Record field | Non-empty/cohort | Completion |
|---|---|---|
| Company name | 246/246 | 100.0% |
| reporting jurisdiction | 246/246 | 100.0% |
| industry | 246/246 | 100.0% |
| Recorded products | 246/246 | 100.0% |
| sub-industry | 246/246 | 100.0% |
| Chain labels | 246/246 | 100.0% |
Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.
| Scope of source support | Count |
|---|---|
| Profiles with source-supported excerpts | 157 |
| Distinct corresponding companies | 157 |
| Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs | 158 |
Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.
| Transparent rule reminder | Records | Cohort share |
|---|---|---|
| Contains registration-narrative wording | 3 | 1.2% |
| Only generic operations vocabulary remains | 3 | 1.2% |
A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.
Intersection with 2026 local lists
47 of this cohort’s 246 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (19.1%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.
| Observation set | List records | New-applicant records | Review records | Mapped company IDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs | 47 | 0 | 47 | 47 |
List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.
Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitionsRelated provincial study
The 2025 macro context for Jiangsu uses a different denominator from this cohort.
Jiangsu Company Archive StudyRecorded roles and delivery checks
Drug-production leads need validation and change records
The Chemical drugs and formulations label covers 18 records (7.3% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Defined pharmaceutical-production or testing services with quality documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.
Delivery framework, stages and original sourcesRelated studies and shared records
Shared records with Jiangsu / Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications Company Structure Study: 185; records in this cohort but outside that set: 61. The intersection/union ratio is 72.0%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison
Shared records with Biomedicine / Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 185; records in this cohort but outside that set: 61. The intersection/union ratio is 13.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison
Company samples and record links
| Company | Jurisdiction | Recorded industry |
|---|---|---|
| CareRay Digital Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Jiangsu Tiansheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Enocon Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| JiangSu Berg Dongjin Pipe-line Equipment Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Xinghua GL Stevia Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Jiangsu Caring Medical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Jiangsu Aidi Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
| Jiangsu Dongbao Pesticide Chemical Co., Ltd. | Jiangsu | Biomedicine |
Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.
Directly related profiles and reports
| Page | Presentation |
|---|---|
| CareRay Digital Medical Technology Co., Ltd. | Company data profile |
| Jiangsu Tiansheng Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | Company data profile |
| Enocon Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. | Company report page |
| JiangSu Berg Dongjin Pipe-line Equipment Co., Ltd. | Company data profile |
| Xinghua GL Stevia Co., Ltd. | Company data profile |
| Jiangsu Caring Medical Technology (Group) Co., Ltd. | Company data profile |