Regional and supply-chain research

Shanghai / Biomedicine Company Structure Study

Shanghai / Biomedicine Company Structure Study. A dated 147-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded chain role, Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 72 records (49.0% of this 147-record cohort). Companies may carry multiple labels in this dimension; participation rates are not additive market shares.

The recorded chain role label Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications accounts for 49.0% here (72/147), compared with 75.1% in the parent set (1,292/1,721), an absolute gap of 26.1 percentage points.

29/147 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (19.7% of the cohort). The other 118 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1471470.8%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Biomedicine, contains 1,721 records. This cohort contributes 147 (8.5%); 1,574 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Shanghai, contains 1,131 records. This cohort contributes 147 (13.0%); 984 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: BiomedicineGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications72/147 · 49.0%1,292/1,721 · 75.1%-26.10.651,220/1,574
chain role · Biomedicine and medical devices / Digital software and industrial services25/147 · 17.0%32/1,721 · 1.9%+15.19.157/1,574
chain role · Biomedicine and medical devices / Basic and process materials12/147 · 8.2%17/1,721 · 1.0%+7.28.265/1,574
sub-industry · Biomedicine66/147 · 44.9%667/1,721 · 38.8%+6.11.16601/1,574
sub-industry · Advanced medical devices48/147 · 32.7%609/1,721 · 35.4%-2.70.92561/1,574

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications covers 1,220/1,574 remaining records (77.5%), an absolute gap of 28.5 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The table shows ten labels; 4 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications7249.0%
Biomedicine and medical devices / Digital software and industrial services2517.0%
Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments149.5%
Biomedicine and medical devices / Basic and process materials128.2%
Biomedicine and medical devices / Process equipment and inspection instruments53.4%
Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Complete systems and use-case applications53.4%
Biomedicine and medical devices / Core components and digital hardware32.0%
Automotive and transport equipment / Process equipment and inspection instruments21.4%
Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials21.4%
Fine chemicals / Process equipment and inspection instruments21.4%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name147/147100.0%
reporting jurisdiction147/147100.0%
industry147/147100.0%
Recorded products147/147100.0%
sub-industry147/147100.0%
Chain labels147/147100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts29
Distinct corresponding companies29
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs30

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording21.4%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains21.4%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

26 of this cohort’s 147 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.7%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs2612526

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Shanghai uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Shanghai Company Archive Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Drug-production leads need validation and change records

The Chemical drugs and formulations label covers 1 records (0.7% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Defined pharmaceutical-production or testing services with quality documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Shanghai / Biomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications Company Structure Study: 72; records in this cohort but outside that set: 75. The intersection/union ratio is 46.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Biomedicine and medical devices / Digital software and industrial services Supply-chain Study: 25; records in this cohort but outside that set: 122. The intersection/union ratio is 16.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions