Regional and supply-chain research

Qingdao Company Structure Study

Qingdao Company Structure Study. A dated 259-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded sub-industry, Instrumentation and testing equipment, contains 25 records (9.7% of this 259-record cohort). Companies may carry multiple labels in this dimension; participation rates are not additive market shares.

The recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments accounts for 32.4% here (84/259), compared with 21.2% in the parent set (4,085/19,297), an absolute gap of 11.3 percentage points.

117/259 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (45.2% of the cohort). The other 142 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
2592591.3%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 259 (1.3%); 19,038 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments84/259 · 32.4%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%+11.31.534,001/19,038
industry · Advanced equipment86/259 · 33.2%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%+7.71.304,832/19,038
chain role · Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware26/259 · 10.0%3,137/19,297 · 16.3%-6.20.623,111/19,038
sub-industry · Instrumentation and testing equipment25/259 · 9.7%719/19,297 · 3.7%+5.92.59694/19,038
chain role · New energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications14/259 · 5.4%1,763/19,297 · 9.1%-3.70.591,749/19,038
industry · Next-generation information technology61/259 · 23.6%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%-3.50.875,165/19,038
sub-industry · Industrial software and information services21/259 · 8.1%906/19,297 · 4.7%+3.41.73885/19,038
sub-industry · Electronic assemblies and systems integration9/259 · 3.5%1,188/19,297 · 6.2%-2.70.561,179/19,038
industry · Biomedicine18/259 · 6.9%1,721/19,297 · 8.9%-2.00.781,703/19,038
industry · New energy and power equipment6/259 · 2.3%757/19,297 · 3.9%-1.60.59751/19,038

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments covers 4,001/19,038 remaining records (21.0%), an absolute gap of 11.4 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The table shows ten labels; 66 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Instrumentation and testing equipment259.7%
Industrial software and information services218.1%
Functional materials and advanced-material platforms176.6%
Biomedicine124.6%
General industrial equipment and automation124.6%
Advanced medical devices114.2%
Environmental protection equipment93.5%
Electronic assemblies and systems integration93.5%
Special-purpose machinery83.1%
Automotive structural parts and components83.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Advanced equipment × Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 64 records, or 74.4% of the 86 records carrying the Advanced equipment label.

industrychain roleIntersection recordsCohort share
Advanced equipmentAdvanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments6424.7%
Advanced materialsAdvanced materials / Basic and process materials2911.2%
Next-generation information technologyElectronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware259.7%
Next-generation information technologyElectronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services218.1%
Energy conservation and environmental protectionEnergy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications135.0%
BiomedicineBiomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications124.6%
Advanced equipmentAutomotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications83.1%
Next-generation information technologyAdvanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments72.7%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 47 non-empty cells; the other 39 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name259/259100.0%
reporting jurisdiction259/259100.0%
industry259/259100.0%
Recorded products259/259100.0%
sub-industry259/259100.0%
Chain labels259/259100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts117
Distinct corresponding companies117
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs120

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording83.1%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains72.7%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters10.4%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

62 of this cohort’s 259 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (23.9%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs6255762
All list records in the same reporting jurisdiction1387860138

The two rows are different sets; subtraction does not establish gaps or relocation. List rows are not new companies or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Municipal context and archive composition

The municipal statistical bulletin and this 259-record reporting-jurisdiction archive have different scopes and are analysed separately.

Which delivery roles warrant study within transport-equipment growth, and can the shipbuilding component be identified separately?

In 2025, value added in Qingdao's above-designated-size railway, ship, aerospace and other transport-equipment manufacturing rose 12.8%. This is the growth rate for a combined industry division; the passage does not report a separate shipbuilding growth rate. [1]

Within the same statistical scope, automotive-manufacturing value added rose 25.9%. The communique defines above-designated-size industrial enterprises as those with annual main-business revenue of at least RMB20 million and calculates value-added growth at constant prices. [1]

Interpreting the archive alongside the bulletin

A Qingdao transport-equipment study should first distinguish rail vehicles, ships and aviation-related uses, then examine evidence for components and process equipment. Growth in the combined division does not establish corresponding shipbuilding growth. Marine applications require original product or project evidence for the company concerned. [1]

An automotive study can compare vehicle assembly, functional components and manufacturing tooling as distinct delivery levels. City-level value-added growth supplies annual context; it does not identify an archived company's customers, automotive supplier qualifications or revenue sources. [1]

Related provincial study

The 2025 macro context for Shandong uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Shandong Company Archive Study

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Qingdao / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Company Structure Study: 84; records in this cohort but outside that set: 175. The intersection/union ratio is 32.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Instrumentation and testing equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 25; records in this cohort but outside that set: 234. The intersection/union ratio is 2.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Qingdao Fulgoal Friction Material Co., Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced materials
Qingdao HONEST Environmental Protection & Technology Co., Ltd.QingdaoEnergy conservation and environmental protection
Shandong Jierui Kaitai Technology Co., Ltd.QingdaoBiomedicine
Far East Electric Appliance Group Co., Ltd.QingdaoNew energy and power equipment
PCE Technoloty (Qingdao) Co., Ltd.QingdaoNew energy and power equipment
Truth Instruments Co., Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced equipment
Bostd Geosynthetics Qingdao Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced materials
Qingdao Reliance Machinery Co., Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced equipment

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions

Sources cited on this page

  1. Qingdao Statistical Communique on National Economic and Social Development in 2025, with official original document · 2026-04-08