Sensor Keyword Candidate Study

Comparative structure study

The query term “testing” matches 1,062/1,363 candidates (77.9%). It can occur across products and industries; interpret the cohort by matched fields rather than treat every candidate as an operating business in this segment.

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 214 records (15.7% of this 1,363-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 1,149 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments accounts for 61.4% here (837/1,363), compared with 21.2% in the parent set (4,085/19,297), an absolute gap of 40.2 percentage points.

491/1,363 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (36.0% of the cohort). The other 872 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 1,363 (7.1%); 17,934 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded chain role label Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments covers 3,248/17,934 remaining records (18.1%), an absolute gap of 43.3 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 34 labels; the top 3 contain 488/1,363 records (35.8%).Other known labels contain 875 records.

For 1,363 records with known labels, the effective category count is 14.0, versus 34 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 24 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 134 records, or 62.6% of the 214 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 169 non-empty cells; the other 161 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “sensors” has the most matches: 191/1,363. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 5, 118 and 99 records respectively; the largest field is product field. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

13 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

262 of this cohort’s 1,363 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (19.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Check traceability and conditions before comparing measurement data

The Sensors and sensing components label covers 72 records (5.3% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Measurement data or instruments with defined objects and methods; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Instrument Testing Equipment Keyword Candidate Study: 1,013; records in this cohort but outside that set: 350. The intersection/union ratio is 69.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Instrumentation and testing equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 700; records in this cohort but outside that set: 663. The intersection/union ratio is 51.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.