CNC machine tools and machining equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 19 records (20.0% of this 95-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 76 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 98.9% here (94/95), compared with 71.2% in the parent set (2,907/4,085), an absolute gap of 27.8 percentage points.

37/95 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (38.9% of the cohort). The other 58 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 4,085 records. This cohort contributes 95 (2.3%); 3,990 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, CNC machine tools and machining equipment, contains 102 records. This cohort contributes 95 (93.1%); 7 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 2,813/3,990 remaining records (70.5%), an absolute gap of 28.4 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 23 labels; the top 3 contain 45/95 records (47.4%).Other known labels contain 50 records.

For 95 records with known labels, the effective category count is 9.8, versus 23 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 13 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 19 records, or 100.0% of the 19 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 24 non-empty cells; the other 16 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

21 of this cohort’s 95 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (22.1%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Industrial Machine Tool Keyword Candidate Study: 95; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 41.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Advanced equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Supply-chain Study: 94; records in this cohort but outside that set: 1. The intersection/union ratio is 3.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.