Aerospace / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Beijing, contains 26 records (17.4% of this 149-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 123 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 98.7% here (147/149), compared with 53.8% in the parent set (383/712), an absolute gap of 44.9 percentage points.

40/149 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (26.8% of the cohort). The other 109 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 712 records. This cohort contributes 149 (20.9%); 563 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Aerospace, contains 241 records. This cohort contributes 149 (61.8%); 92 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 236/563 remaining records (41.9%), an absolute gap of 56.7 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 25 labels; the top 3 contain 57/149 records (38.3%).Other known labels contain 92 records.

For 149 records with known labels, the effective category count is 12.2, versus 25 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 15 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Beijing × Advanced equipment, contains 26 records, or 100.0% of the 26 records carrying the Beijing label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 26 non-empty cells; the other 18 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

35 of this cohort’s 149 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (23.5%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Advanced equipment / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 147; records in this cohort but outside that set: 2. The intersection/union ratio is 38.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Commercial Space Keyword Candidate Study: 149; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 28.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.