Metals and alloy materials / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 62 records (21.8% of this 284-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 222 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Jiangsu accounts for 21.8% here (62/284), compared with 16.0% in the parent set (456/2,854), an absolute gap of 5.9 percentage points.

109/284 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (38.4% of the cohort). The other 175 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 2,854 records. This cohort contributes 284 (10.0%); 2,570 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Metals and alloy materials, contains 284 records. This cohort contributes 284 (100.0%); 0 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Jiangsu covers 394/2,570 remaining records (15.3%), an absolute gap of 6.5 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 32 labels; the top 3 contain 107/284 records (37.7%).Other known labels contain 177 records.

For 284 records with known labels, the effective category count is 12.1, versus 32 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 22 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced materials, contains 59 records, or 95.2% of the 62 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 35 non-empty cells; the other 27 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

50 of this cohort’s 284 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Aluminum Magnesium Titanium Alloy Keyword Candidate Study: 284; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 55.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Advanced materials / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Supply-chain Study: 279; records in this cohort but outside that set: 5. The intersection/union ratio is 10.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.