Regional and supply-chain research

Transport equipment and application systems / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Transport equipment and application systems / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study. A dated 131-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 22 records (16.8% of this 131-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 109 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 76.3% here (100/131), compared with 53.8% in the parent set (383/712), an absolute gap of 22.5 percentage points.

49/131 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (37.4% of the cohort). The other 82 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1311310.7%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 712 records. This cohort contributes 131 (18.4%); 581 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Transport equipment and application systems, contains 131 records. This cohort contributes 131 (100.0%); 0 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applicationsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · Advanced equipment100/131 · 76.3%383/712 · 53.8%+22.51.42283/581
industry · Producer services20/131 · 15.3%70/712 · 9.8%+5.41.5550/581
reporting jurisdiction · Beijing17/131 · 13.0%67/712 · 9.4%+3.61.3850/581
reporting jurisdiction · Henan7/131 · 5.3%20/712 · 2.8%+2.51.9013/581
reporting jurisdiction · Hebei7/131 · 5.3%21/712 · 2.9%+2.41.8114/581
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu22/131 · 16.8%103/712 · 14.5%+2.31.1681/581
industry · Advanced materials5/131 · 3.8%16/712 · 2.2%+1.61.7011/581

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 283/581 remaining records (48.7%), an absolute gap of 27.6 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 27 labels; the top 3 contain 48/131 records (36.6%).Other known labels contain 83 records.

For 131 records with known labels, the effective category count is 13.9, versus 27 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 17 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Jiangsu2216.8%
Beijing1713.0%
Shandong96.9%
Hebei75.3%
Henan75.3%
Hubei75.3%
Hunan64.6%
Chongqing64.6%
Sichuan53.8%
Shanxi43.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 17 records, or 77.3% of the 22 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
JiangsuAdvanced equipment1713.0%
BeijingAdvanced equipment107.6%
BeijingProducer services75.3%
ShandongAdvanced equipment75.3%
HebeiAdvanced equipment75.3%
ChongqingAdvanced equipment64.6%
HenanAdvanced equipment53.8%
HubeiAdvanced equipment53.8%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 46 non-empty cells; the other 38 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name131/131100.0%
reporting jurisdiction131/131100.0%
industry131/131100.0%
Recorded products131/131100.0%
sub-industry131/131100.0%
Chain labels131/131100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts49
Distinct corresponding companies49
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs52

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording96.9%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains43.1%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

23 of this cohort’s 131 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (17.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs2322123

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Advanced equipment / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 100; records in this cohort but outside that set: 31. The intersection/union ratio is 24.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 131; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 18.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions