Rare earths and specialty metals / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shaanxi, contains 12 records (12.9% of this 93-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 81 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Shaanxi accounts for 12.9% here (12/93), compared with 1.9% in the parent set (54/2,854), an absolute gap of 11.0 percentage points.

32/93 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (34.4% of the cohort). The other 61 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 2,854 records. This cohort contributes 93 (3.3%); 2,761 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Rare earths and specialty metals, contains 93 records. This cohort contributes 93 (100.0%); 0 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Shaanxi covers 42/2,761 remaining records (1.5%), an absolute gap of 11.4 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 22 labels; the top 3 contain 30/93 records (32.3%).Other known labels contain 63 records.

For 93 records with known labels, the effective category count is 13.8, versus 22 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 12 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Shaanxi × Advanced materials, contains 12 records, or 100.0% of the 12 records carrying the Shaanxi label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 23 non-empty cells; the other 15 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

15 of this cohort’s 93 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (16.1%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Rare Earth Permanent Magnet Materials Keyword Candidate Study: 93; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 47.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Powder Metallurgy Metal Powder Keyword Candidate Study: 14; records in this cohort but outside that set: 79. The intersection/union ratio is 11.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.