General-purpose fine chemicals / Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Shandong, contains 33 records (16.6% of this 199-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 166 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced chemicals accounts for 44.2% here (88/199), compared with 33.4% in the parent set (247/740), an absolute gap of 10.8 percentage points.

79/199 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (39.7% of the cohort). The other 120 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials, contains 740 records. This cohort contributes 199 (26.9%); 541 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, General-purpose fine chemicals, contains 199 records. This cohort contributes 199 (100.0%); 0 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced chemicals covers 159/541 remaining records (29.4%), an absolute gap of 14.8 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 28 labels; the top 3 contain 79/199 records (39.7%).Other known labels contain 120 records.

For 199 records with known labels, the effective category count is 12.9, versus 28 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 18 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced materials, contains 21 records, or 65.6% of the 32 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 57 non-empty cells; the other 49 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

42 of this cohort’s 199 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (21.1%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Fine Chemical Materials Keyword Candidate Study: 199; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 27.1%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials Supply-chain Study: 199; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 26.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.