Environmental equipment and treatment systems / Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 36 records (20.5% of this 176-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 140 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Beijing accounts for 14.2% here (25/176), compared with 8.1% in the parent set (56/693), an absolute gap of 6.1 percentage points.

57/176 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (32.4% of the cohort). The other 119 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 693 records. This cohort contributes 176 (25.4%); 517 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Environmental equipment and treatment systems, contains 176 records. This cohort contributes 176 (100.0%); 0 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Beijing covers 31/517 remaining records (6.0%), an absolute gap of 8.2 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 28 labels; the top 3 contain 84/176 records (47.7%).Other known labels contain 92 records.

For 176 records with known labels, the effective category count is 10.3, versus 28 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 18 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Energy conservation and environmental protection, contains 35 records, or 97.2% of the 36 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 34 non-empty cells; the other 26 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

41 of this cohort’s 176 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (23.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Energy Saving Carbon Reduction Equipment Keyword Candidate Study: 143; records in this cohort but outside that set: 33. The intersection/union ratio is 29.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Energy conservation and environmental protection / Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 168; records in this cohort but outside that set: 8. The intersection/union ratio is 25.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.