Regional and supply-chain research

Advanced materials / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Advanced materials / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study. A dated 95-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Guangdong, contains 37 records (38.9% of this 95-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 58 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Guangdong accounts for 38.9% here (37/95), compared with 7.3% in the parent set (209/2,854), an absolute gap of 31.6 percentage points.

14/95 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (14.7% of the cohort). The other 81 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
95950.5%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 2,854 records. This cohort contributes 95 (3.3%); 2,759 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Advanced materials, contains 102 records. This cohort contributes 95 (93.1%); 7 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Advanced materials / Basic and process materialsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
reporting jurisdiction · Guangdong37/95 · 38.9%209/2,854 · 7.3%+31.65.32172/2,759
reporting jurisdiction · Anhui21/95 · 22.1%158/2,854 · 5.5%+16.63.99137/2,759
reporting jurisdiction · Hubei15/95 · 15.8%122/2,854 · 4.3%+11.53.69107/2,759
industry · Advanced materials95/95 · 100.0%2,664/2,854 · 93.3%+6.71.072,569/2,759
reporting jurisdiction · Shanghai10/95 · 10.5%112/2,854 · 3.9%+6.62.68102/2,759

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Guangdong covers 172/2,759 remaining records (6.2%), an absolute gap of 32.7 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 8 labels; the top 3 contain 73/95 records (76.8%).Other known labels contain 22 records.

For 95 records with known labels, the effective category count is 4.1, versus 8 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Guangdong3738.9%
Anhui2122.1%
Hubei1515.8%
Shanghai1010.5%
Sichuan55.3%
Fujian33.2%
Liaoning33.2%
Hunan11.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Guangdong × Advanced materials, contains 37 records, or 100.0% of the 37 records carrying the Guangdong label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
GuangdongAdvanced materials3738.9%
AnhuiAdvanced materials2122.1%
HubeiAdvanced materials1515.8%
ShanghaiAdvanced materials1010.5%
SichuanAdvanced materials55.3%
FujianAdvanced materials33.2%
LiaoningAdvanced materials33.2%
HunanAdvanced materials11.1%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

All 8 non-empty cross-tab cells are displayed.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name95/95100.0%
reporting jurisdiction95/95100.0%
industry95/95100.0%
Recorded products95/95100.0%
sub-industry95/95100.0%
Chain labels95/95100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts14
Distinct corresponding companies14
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs16

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

79 of this cohort’s 95 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (83.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs7907979

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Guangdong / Advanced materials / Basic and process materials Company Structure Study: 37; records in this cohort but outside that set: 58. The intersection/union ratio is 13.9%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Guangdong / Advanced materials Company Structure Study: 37; records in this cohort but outside that set: 58. The intersection/union ratio is 12.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Shanghai Hailong Sai Neng New Materials Co., Ltd.ShanghaiAdvanced materials
Anhui Tongda New Material Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced materials
Guangdong Cailong New Material Co., Ltd.GuangdongAdvanced materials
Sichuan Develop China Tech New Materials Co., Ltd.SichuanAdvanced materials
Guangdong Kingbali New Material Co., Ltd.GuangdongAdvanced materials
Anhui Dotop New Material Technology Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced materials
Changqingteng HIGH Performance FIBER Material Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced materials
Guangzhou Huitian New Material Co., Ltd.GuangdongAdvanced materials

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions