Regional and supply-chain research

Wind Power Blades Transmission Parts Keyword Candidate Study

Wind Power Blades Transmission Parts Keyword Candidate Study. A dated 104-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 34 records (32.7% of this 104-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 70 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 53.8% here (56/104), compared with 25.5% in the parent set (4,918/19,297), an absolute gap of 28.4 percentage points.

41/104 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (39.4% of the cohort). The other 63 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

10 keyword candidates match only a company name, with no matching term in recorded products or sub-industry fields. Product evidence is needed before treating these as operating businesses in this segment.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
1041040.5%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 104 (0.5%); 19,193 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · Advanced equipment56/104 · 53.8%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%+28.42.114,862/19,193
chain role · Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments45/104 · 43.3%4,085/19,297 · 21.2%+22.12.044,040/19,193
industry · Next-generation information technology8/104 · 7.7%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%-19.40.285,218/19,193
reporting jurisdiction · Jiangsu34/104 · 32.7%3,025/19,297 · 15.7%+17.02.092,991/19,193
sub-industry · Transmission and drive devices10/104 · 9.6%84/19,297 · 0.4%+9.222.0974/19,193
chain role · New energy and power equipment / Core components and digital hardware10/104 · 9.6%180/19,297 · 0.9%+8.710.31170/19,193
industry · New energy and power equipment13/104 · 12.5%757/19,297 · 3.9%+8.63.19744/19,193
sub-industry · New-energy equipment8/104 · 7.7%50/19,297 · 0.3%+7.429.6942/19,193
sub-industry · Special-purpose machinery8/104 · 7.7%433/19,297 · 2.2%+5.43.43425/19,193
industry · Biomedicine5/104 · 4.8%1,721/19,297 · 8.9%-4.10.541,716/19,193

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 4,862/19,193 remaining records (25.3%), an absolute gap of 28.5 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 24 labels; the top 3 contain 48/104 records (46.2%).Other known labels contain 56 records.

For 104 records with known labels, the effective category count is 7.4, versus 24 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 14 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Jiangsu3432.7%
Shandong76.7%
Zhejiang76.7%
Shanghai65.8%
Sichuan65.8%
Beijing43.8%
Guangdong43.8%
Hebei43.8%
Henan43.8%
Qingdao43.8%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 21 records, or 61.8% of the 34 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
JiangsuAdvanced equipment2120.2%
ShandongAdvanced equipment54.8%
ZhejiangAdvanced equipment54.8%
JiangsuAdvanced materials43.8%
JiangsuNew energy and power equipment43.8%
ShanghaiAdvanced materials32.9%
JiangsuNext-generation information technology32.9%
ShanghaiAdvanced equipment21.9%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 53 non-empty cells; the other 45 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name104/104100.0%
reporting jurisdiction104/104100.0%
industry104/104100.0%
Recorded products104/104100.0%
sub-industry104/104100.0%
Chain labels104/104100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts41
Distinct corresponding companies41
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs42

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording21.9%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Matched fieldCandidatesCohort share
Company name1110.6%
Recorded products8379.8%
Sub-industry1514.4%

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “wind power” has the most matches: 77/104. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 8, 58 and 15 records respectively; the largest field is product field. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected query termCandidates/shareName matchesProduct fieldSub-industry
wind power77 · 74.0%85815

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

10 candidates match only a name, or lose all product-field matches after the full company name is removed while sub-industry also has no hit. This transparent string test locates copied company descriptions; it does not establish that a company does not operate the business.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

33 of this cohort’s 104 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (31.7%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs3303333

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Power-equipment design must connect to manufacturing and assembly

The Cables and conductors label covers 2 records (1.9% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Components or equipment with design-to-manufacturing fit documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Nuclear Wind Power Equipment Keyword Candidate Study: 86; records in this cohort but outside that set: 18. The intersection/union ratio is 13.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Hydraulic Transmission Gearbox Reducer Keyword Candidate Study: 17; records in this cohort but outside that set: 87. The intersection/union ratio is 11.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Mianyang Maxewell Technology Co., Ltd.SichuanAdvanced materials
Zhejiang TongLi Transmission Technology Co., Ltd.ZhejiangAdvanced equipment
Shanxi Jinrui High Pressure Rings Co., Ltd.ShanxiNew energy and power equipment
Qingdao Reliance Machinery Co., Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced equipment
Qingdao Wancheng Anchor CHAIN Co., Ltd.QingdaoAdvanced materials
Chengdu Forward Technology Co., Ltd.SichuanNew energy and power equipment
Maanshan Jingwei Slewing Bearing Co., Ltd.AnhuiAdvanced equipment
Sinomatech (Jiuquan) Wind Power Blade Co., Ltd.GansuNew energy and power equipment

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions