Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study

Filter-difference study

Against the 713-record Environmental Water Treatment Keyword Candidate Study, this 693-record cohort shares 573 records. Only 120 occur here and 140 only in the reference; the union contains 833. These are filter-membership differences, not company entries or exits.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The largest recorded sub-industry participation gap is for Energy saving and waste-heat utilisation: 53/693 here versus 3/713 in the reference, an absolute difference of 7.2 percentage points. The cohorts have overlapping company IDs and are not independent samples.

Zero means no recorded label, not no business; multi-label cells overlap.

Multi-label counts can overlap; filter compliance is not industrial advantage.

Existing excerpts do not certify entire old reports; list linkage is not final recognition. Full definitions are on the series page.

Assess environmental products against treatment media

The Environmental protection equipment label covers 306 records (44.2% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Treatment equipment, materials or chemicals for defined objects; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Energy conservation and environmental protection / Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 640; records in this cohort but outside that set: 53. The intersection/union ratio is 92.4%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Environmental Water Treatment Keyword Candidate Study: 573; records in this cohort but outside that set: 120. The intersection/union ratio is 68.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison