Environmental Water Treatment Keyword Candidate Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 123 records (17.3% of this 713-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 590 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Energy conservation and environmental protection accounts for 84.6% here (603/713), compared with 4.5% in the parent set (869/19,297), an absolute gap of 80.1 percentage points.

272/713 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (38.1% of the cohort). The other 441 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 713 (3.7%); 18,584 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Energy conservation and environmental protection covers 266/18,584 remaining records (1.4%), an absolute gap of 83.1 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 35 labels; the top 3 contain 248/713 records (34.8%).Other known labels contain 465 records.

For 713 records with known labels, the effective category count is 14.3, versus 35 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 25 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Energy conservation and environmental protection, contains 109 records, or 88.6% of the 123 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 101 non-empty cells; the other 93 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “environmental protection equipment” has the most matches: 511/713. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 2, 6 and 505 records respectively; the largest field is sub-industry label. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

142 of this cohort’s 713 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (19.9%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Assess environmental products against treatment media

The Environmental protection equipment label covers 329 records (46.1% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Treatment equipment, materials or chemicals for defined objects; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 573; records in this cohort but outside that set: 140. The intersection/union ratio is 68.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Energy conservation and environmental protection / Energy conservation, environmental protection and resource recycling / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 541; records in this cohort but outside that set: 172. The intersection/union ratio is 66.6%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.