Liaoning Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced equipment, contains 92 records (32.3% of this 285-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 193 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Next-generation information technology accounts for 14.0% here (40/285), compared with 27.1% in the parent set (5,226/19,297), an absolute gap of 13.0 percentage points.

156/285 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (54.7% of the cohort). The other 129 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The deduplicated union of Liaoning + Dalian has 392 records; this page retains the original jurisdiction cohort of 285. Provincial statistics, combined archives and reporting jurisdictions use separate denominators.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 285 (1.5%); 19,012 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Next-generation information technology covers 5,186/19,012 remaining records (27.3%), an absolute gap of 13.2 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 10 labels; the top 3 contain 218/285 records (76.5%).Other known labels contain 67 records.

For 285 records with known labels, the effective category count is 4.4, versus 10 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Advanced materials × Advanced materials / Basic and process materials, contains 53 records, or 61.6% of the 86 records carrying the Advanced materials label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 47 non-empty cells; the other 39 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

52 of this cohort’s 285 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (18.2%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

The two rows are different sets; subtraction does not establish gaps or relocation. List rows are not new companies or final recognition.

The provincial macro sources below use a different denominator from this 285-record archive cohort; they do not establish individual operating results.

Can company records resolve the product mix behind transport-equipment growth and an automotive decline?

Liaoning’s official 2025 economic release reported 41.8% value-added growth in railway, ship, aerospace and other transport equipment manufacturing above designated size, while automobile manufacturing fell by 4.3%. The transport-equipment category combines several industries; its growth rate cannot be assigned to aerospace or shipbuilding alone. [1]

Interpretation and test conditions

Liaoning reported growth for the combined railway, shipbuilding, aerospace and other transport-equipment category in 2025, while automotive manufacturing declined. Disaggregate the combined category before interpretation. Its growth rate belongs to neither rail, ships nor aerospace alone. [1]

Count systems, dedicated components and processing services by their stated applications, then check qualifications or test records. Automotive and other transport equipment may use similar material or process terms but require different validation. Shared terminology does not establish cross-chain supply. [1]

Growth in the combined category alongside an automotive decline makes end-market use a useful comparison for processing firms. An automotive-only product requires a different reading from one documented across transport uses. Show source-supported application groups and retain records with uncertain uses outside them. [1]

Shared records with Liaoning / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Company Structure Study: 75; records in this cohort but outside that set: 210. The intersection/union ratio is 26.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Advanced chemicals / Fine chemicals / Basic and process materials Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 23; records in this cohort but outside that set: 262. The intersection/union ratio is 4.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

1. Liaoning: Economic Performance in 2025 · 2026-01-22