Regional and supply-chain research

Jilin Company Structure Study

Jilin Company Structure Study. A dated 94-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, Advanced equipment, contains 27 records (28.7% of this 94-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 67 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Automotive structural parts and components accounts for 20.2% here (19/94), compared with 2.0% in the parent set (388/19,297), an absolute gap of 18.2 percentage points.

25/94 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (26.6% of the cohort). The other 69 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
94940.5%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 94 (0.5%); 19,203 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: All public archive recordsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
sub-industry · Automotive structural parts and components19/94 · 20.2%388/19,297 · 2.0%+18.210.05369/19,203
industry · New-energy vehicles21/94 · 22.3%960/19,297 · 5.0%+17.44.49939/19,203
chain role · Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware11/94 · 11.7%506/19,297 · 2.6%+9.14.46495/19,203
chain role · Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications11/94 · 11.7%712/19,297 · 3.7%+8.03.17701/19,203
industry · Next-generation information technology19/94 · 20.2%5,226/19,297 · 27.1%-6.90.755,207/19,203
chain role · Advanced materials / Basic and process materials8/94 · 8.5%2,854/19,297 · 14.8%-6.30.582,846/19,203
industry · Advanced materials12/94 · 12.8%3,381/19,297 · 17.5%-4.80.733,369/19,203
industry · Advanced equipment27/94 · 28.7%4,918/19,297 · 25.5%+3.21.134,891/19,203
sub-industry · Advanced medical devices6/94 · 6.4%878/19,297 · 4.5%+1.81.40872/19,203
sub-industry · Instrumentation and testing equipment5/94 · 5.3%719/19,297 · 3.7%+1.61.43714/19,203

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Automotive structural parts and components covers 369/19,203 remaining records (1.9%), an absolute gap of 18.3 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full industry distribution has 7 labels; the top 3 contain 67/94 records (71.3%).Other known labels contain 27 records.

For 94 records with known labels, the effective category count is 4.9, versus 7 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Advanced equipment2728.7%
New-energy vehicles2122.3%
Next-generation information technology1920.2%
Advanced materials1212.8%
Biomedicine1111.7%
New energy and power equipment22.1%
Producer services22.1%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Advanced equipment × Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 16 records, or 59.3% of the 27 records carrying the Advanced equipment label.

industrychain roleIntersection recordsCohort share
Advanced equipmentAdvanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments1617.0%
Next-generation information technologyElectronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware1111.7%
New-energy vehiclesAutomotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware1111.7%
BiomedicineBiomedicine and medical devices / Complete systems and use-case applications99.6%
Advanced materialsAdvanced materials / Basic and process materials88.5%
New-energy vehiclesAutomotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications77.4%
Next-generation information technologyElectronic information and digital technology / Digital software and industrial services44.3%
New-energy vehiclesNew energy and power equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications33.2%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 27 non-empty cells; the other 19 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name94/94100.0%
reporting jurisdiction94/94100.0%
industry94/94100.0%
Recorded products94/94100.0%
sub-industry94/94100.0%
Chain labels94/94100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts25
Distinct corresponding companies25
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs25

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording66.4%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains44.3%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

20 of this cohort’s 94 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (21.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs2002020
All list records in the same reporting jurisdiction41212041

The two rows are different sets; subtraction does not establish gaps or relocation. List rows are not new companies or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Provincial context and cohort interpretation

The provincial macro sources below use a different denominator from this 94-record archive cohort; they do not establish individual operating results.

Do component applications align with a falling vehicle total and rising new-energy output?

In 2025, Jilin’s vehicle output fell by 3.5%, while new energy vehicle output rose by 22.5%. Output of multiple-unit train vehicles and urban rail vehicles grew by 22.8% and 42.8%, respectively. Supplier analysis should distinguish vehicle segments and the different qualification systems used in automotive and rail equipment. [1]

Interpretation and test conditions

Jilin recorded lower total vehicle output but higher new-energy-vehicle output in 2025; multiple-unit trains and urban rail vehicles also increased. Separate end products before examining components. New-energy vehicles sit within the vehicle total, so their increase cannot be added to it. [1]

For automotive suppliers, examine whether products serve more than one powertrain route. Product documents must support the uses of structural parts, control systems or dedicated processes. A shift towards new-energy vehicles may change demand across stages, but output statistics cannot identify a firm's gain or loss. [1]

Group rail-equipment records by their own products and qualifications. Compare product overlap and evidence coverage between automotive and rail records to distinguish shared processes from dedicated systems. A high-end-equipment label cannot make that distinction. [1]

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Automotive structural parts and components / Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 11; records in this cohort but outside that set: 83. The intersection/union ratio is 4.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Die Casting Lightweight Structural Parts Keyword Candidate Study: 20; records in this cohort but outside that set: 74. The intersection/union ratio is 3.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Changchun Changguang Aerospace Composite Materials Co., Ltd.JilinAdvanced materials
Changchun GOLD Research Institute Co., Ltd.JilinAdvanced materials
Jilin Jike Soft Information Technology Co., Ltd.JilinNext-generation information technology
Jilin Jinguan Electric Co., Ltd.JilinAdvanced equipment
Chutian Huatong Technology Co., Ltd.JilinBiomedicine
Jilin Province Axle Auto Components and Parts Co., Ltd.JilinNew-energy vehicles
Changchun Borui Science & Technology Co., Ltd.JilinBiomedicine
Jilin Jiaxin General Machinery Group Co., Ltd.JilinNext-generation information technology

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions

Sources cited on this page

  1. Jilin: Statistical Communiqué on National Economic and Social Development in 2025 · 2026-04-27