Semiconductor Keyword Candidate Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 198 records (18.1% of this 1,093-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 895 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Next-generation information technology accounts for 85.6% here (936/1,093), compared with 27.1% in the parent set (5,226/19,297), an absolute gap of 58.6 percentage points.

342/1,093 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (31.3% of the cohort). The other 751 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, All public archive records, contains 19,297 records. This cohort contributes 1,093 (5.7%); 18,204 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Next-generation information technology covers 4,290/18,204 remaining records (23.6%), an absolute gap of 62.1 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 33 labels; the top 3 contain 516/1,093 records (47.2%).Other known labels contain 577 records.

For 1,093 records with known labels, the effective category count is 9.8, versus 33 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 23 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Next-generation information technology, contains 171 records, or 86.4% of the 198 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 104 non-empty cells; the other 96 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

An ID may match several fields, so counts may exceed the cohort total. Matches establish search relevance only.

Among the translated non-broad query terms, “semiconductors” has the most matches: 861/1,093. Name, product and sub-industry fields match 256, 448 and 725 records respectively; the largest field is sub-industry label. Fields can overlap, and a term remains a search link rather than verified business activity.

Selected broad terms and specific segment terms, not the full query. Terms and fields can overlap and must not be summed. Counts show lexical sensitivity; no records are removed without primary evidence.

234 of this cohort’s 1,093 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (21.4%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Searching company names, product fields and sub-industry labels for the three Chinese terms translated as semiconductor, integrated circuit and chip matches 1,093 public records. Of these, 301 carry the semiconductor-equipment label and 52 the electronic-and-semiconductor-materials label. The search therefore spans equipment and materials labels: it is not a list confined to chip manufacturers and does not verify actual products or capacity.

There are 752 records in this cohort but not in the seven-term equipment cohort. The cohorts share 341 records and their union contains 1,846. These differences reflect field and vocabulary boundaries, not proof of supply-chain roles or mutually exclusive business activities. Verification still requires identifiable original product evidence for each company; name matches and shared labels cannot establish manufacturing capability.

Components and equipment carry different validation tasks

The Semiconductor equipment label covers 301 records (27.5% of this cohort). This archive clue raises a verification question about Devices or process-specific equipment with corresponding test documents; it does not establish that these companies already deliver it.

Shared records with Next-generation information technology / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Supply-chain Study: 780; records in this cohort but outside that set: 313. The intersection/union ratio is 24.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Semiconductors and integrated circuits / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study: 259; records in this cohort but outside that set: 834. The intersection/union ratio is 23.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.