Semiconductors and integrated circuits / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 59 records (22.8% of this 259-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 200 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Next-generation information technology accounts for 97.3% here (252/259), compared with 90.1% in the parent set (2,827/3,137), an absolute gap of 7.2 percentage points.

89/259 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (34.4% of the cohort). The other 170 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware, contains 3,137 records. This cohort contributes 259 (8.3%); 2,878 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Semiconductors and integrated circuits, contains 278 records. This cohort contributes 259 (93.2%); 19 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Next-generation information technology covers 2,575/2,878 remaining records (89.5%), an absolute gap of 7.8 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 23 labels; the top 3 contain 128/259 records (49.4%).Other known labels contain 131 records.

For 259 records with known labels, the effective category count is 9.0, versus 23 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 13 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Next-generation information technology, contains 58 records, or 98.3% of the 59 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 26 non-empty cells; the other 18 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

48 of this cohort’s 259 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (18.5%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Semiconductor Keyword Candidate Study: 259; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 23.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Ic Design Chip Ip Keyword Candidate Study: 31; records in this cohort but outside that set: 228. The intersection/union ratio is 9.6%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.