Intelligent manufacturing line equipment / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 38 records (24.4% of this 156-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 118 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label Advanced equipment accounts for 88.5% here (138/156), compared with 71.2% in the parent set (2,907/4,085), an absolute gap of 17.3 percentage points.

76/156 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (48.7% of the cohort). The other 80 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments, contains 4,085 records. This cohort contributes 156 (3.8%); 3,929 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Intelligent manufacturing line equipment, contains 168 records. This cohort contributes 156 (92.9%); 12 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label Advanced equipment covers 2,769/3,929 remaining records (70.5%), an absolute gap of 18.0 percentage points from this cohort.

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 22 labels; the top 3 contain 80/156 records (51.3%).Other known labels contain 76 records.

For 156 records with known labels, the effective category count is 8.8, versus 22 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 12 others are included in the calculations above.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × Advanced equipment, contains 33 records, or 86.8% of the 38 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 35 non-empty cells; the other 27 remain in the analysis.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

29 of this cohort’s 156 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (18.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Shared records with Robotics Keyword Candidate Study: 156; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 9.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Guangdong / Advanced equipment and industrial automation / Process equipment and inspection instruments Company Structure Study: 23; records in this cohort but outside that set: 133. The intersection/union ratio is 5.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.