Regional and supply-chain research

Automotive structural parts and components / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Automotive structural parts and components / Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study. A dated 203-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Jiangsu, contains 30 records (14.8% of this 203-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 173 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded industry label New-energy vehicles accounts for 90.6% here (184/203), compared with 29.8% in the parent set (212/712), an absolute gap of 60.9 percentage points.

77/203 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (37.9% of the cohort). The other 126 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
2032031.1%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications, contains 712 records. This cohort contributes 203 (28.5%); 509 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Automotive structural parts and components, contains 388 records. This cohort contributes 203 (52.3%); 185 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applicationsGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
industry · New-energy vehicles184/203 · 90.6%212/712 · 29.8%+60.93.0428/509
reporting jurisdiction · Zhejiang27/203 · 13.3%54/712 · 7.6%+5.71.7527/509
reporting jurisdiction · Ningbo14/203 · 6.9%22/712 · 3.1%+3.82.238/509
industry · Producer services13/203 · 6.4%70/712 · 9.8%-3.40.6557/509
reporting jurisdiction · Shandong20/203 · 9.9%48/712 · 6.7%+3.11.4628/509
reporting jurisdiction · Hubei18/203 · 8.9%45/712 · 6.3%+2.51.4027/509
industry · Advanced materials5/203 · 2.5%16/712 · 2.2%+0.21.1011/509

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded industry label New-energy vehicles covers 28/509 remaining records (5.5%), an absolute gap of 85.1 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 25 labels; the top 3 contain 77/203 records (37.9%).Other known labels contain 126 records.

For 203 records with known labels, the effective category count is 12.9, versus 25 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

The table shows ten labels; 15 others are included in the calculations above.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Jiangsu3014.8%
Zhejiang2713.3%
Shandong209.9%
Hubei188.9%
Ningbo146.9%
Anhui125.9%
Chongqing125.9%
Hebei83.9%
Jilin73.4%
Henan73.4%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Jiangsu × New-energy vehicles, contains 27 records, or 90.0% of the 30 records carrying the Jiangsu label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
JiangsuNew-energy vehicles2713.3%
ZhejiangNew-energy vehicles2512.3%
ShandongNew-energy vehicles188.9%
HubeiNew-energy vehicles167.9%
NingboNew-energy vehicles136.4%
AnhuiNew-energy vehicles125.9%
ChongqingNew-energy vehicles125.9%
JilinNew-energy vehicles73.4%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 40 non-empty cells; the other 32 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name203/203100.0%
reporting jurisdiction203/203100.0%
industry203/203100.0%
Recorded products203/203100.0%
sub-industry203/203100.0%
Chain labels203/203100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts77
Distinct corresponding companies77
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs78

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Contains registration-narrative wording178.4%
Only generic operations vocabulary remains73.4%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

38 of this cohort’s 203 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (18.7%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs3813738

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Die Casting Lightweight Structural Parts Keyword Candidate Study: 203; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 38.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Automotive and transport equipment / Complete systems and use-case applications Supply-chain Study: 203; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 28.5%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Jiangsu Easyland AUTOMOTIVE CorporationJiangsuNew-energy vehicles
Maomao (Chongqing) Automotive Drive System Co., Ltd.ChongqingNew-energy vehicles
LUCKY HARVEST (CHANGSHU) Co., Ltd.JiangsuNew-energy vehicles
Chaoyang Huaxing Wanda Tyre Co., Ltd.LiaoningNew-energy vehicles
Henan Guangrui AUTOMOTIVE PARTS Co., Ltd.HenanNew-energy vehicles
Wuhu Hetian AUTO Industry Co., Ltd.AnhuiNew-energy vehicles
Zhejiang Nate Automotive Standard Parts Co., Ltd.ZhejiangNew-energy vehicles
ZheJiang YangMing Auto Parts Co., Ltd.NingboNew-energy vehicles

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions