Regional and supply-chain research

Next-generation information technology / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study

Next-generation information technology / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Sub-industry and Supply-chain Study. A dated 98-record cohort study compares composition, parent sets and evidence coverage. Comparative structure study; archive date 2026-10-16.

Revision and archive snapshot: 2026-10-16

Swipe tables sideways to see all columns.

Research findings

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded reporting jurisdiction, Guangdong, contains 46 records (46.9% of this 98-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 52 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded reporting jurisdiction label Guangdong accounts for 46.9% here (46/98), compared with 9.9% in the parent set (310/3,137), an absolute gap of 37.1 percentage points.

15/98 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (15.3% of the cohort). The other 83 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

Company cohortDirectly linked pagesShare of public archiveArchive date
98980.5%2026-10-16

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

Comparable sets and compositional differences

The parent set, Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware, contains 3,137 records. This cohort contributes 98 (3.1%); 3,039 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Next-generation information technology, contains 148 records. This cohort contributes 98 (66.2%); 50 records remain after excluding it.

CategoryCohort count/baseReference: Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardwareGap (pp)Representation ratioRest count/base
reporting jurisdiction · Guangdong46/98 · 46.9%310/3,137 · 9.9%+37.14.75264/3,039
reporting jurisdiction · Anhui15/98 · 15.3%140/3,137 · 4.5%+10.83.43125/3,039
industry · Next-generation information technology98/98 · 100.0%2,827/3,137 · 90.1%+9.91.112,729/3,039
reporting jurisdiction · Shanghai15/98 · 15.3%202/3,137 · 6.4%+8.92.38187/3,039
reporting jurisdiction · Sichuan8/98 · 8.2%145/3,137 · 4.6%+3.51.77137/3,039

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded reporting jurisdiction label Guangdong covers 264/3,039 remaining records (8.7%), an absolute gap of 38.3 percentage points from this cohort.

Concentration and cross-sectional structure

The full reporting jurisdiction distribution has 9 labels; the top 3 contain 76/98 records (77.6%).Other known labels contain 22 records.

For 98 records with known labels, the effective category count is 3.6, versus 9 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Recorded labelRecordsShare of cohort
Guangdong4646.9%
Shanghai1515.3%
Anhui1515.3%
Sichuan88.2%
Hubei66.1%
Xiamen33.1%
Fujian33.1%
Hunan11.0%
Liaoning11.0%

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

The largest intersection, Guangdong × Next-generation information technology, contains 46 records, or 100.0% of the 46 records carrying the Guangdong label.

reporting jurisdictionindustryIntersection recordsCohort share
GuangdongNext-generation information technology4646.9%
ShanghaiNext-generation information technology1515.3%
AnhuiNext-generation information technology1515.3%
SichuanNext-generation information technology88.2%
HubeiNext-generation information technology66.1%
XiamenNext-generation information technology33.1%
FujianNext-generation information technology33.1%
HunanNext-generation information technology11.0%

A cell contains company IDs carrying both labels. It does not establish procurement, supply or investment relationships between firms. Multi-label cells may overlap.

This page displays 8 of the full cross-tab’s 9 non-empty cells; the other 1 remain in the analysis.

Evidence coverage and strength of conclusions

Record fieldNon-empty/cohortCompletion
Company name98/98100.0%
reporting jurisdiction98/98100.0%
industry98/98100.0%
Recorded products98/98100.0%
sub-industry98/98100.0%
Chain labels98/98100.0%

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Scope of source supportCount
Profiles with source-supported excerpts15
Distinct corresponding companies15
Reviewed Chinese/English paragraph pairs16

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

Transparent rule reminderRecordsCohort share
Only generic operations vocabulary remains11.0%
Non-empty text shorter than five characters11.0%

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

Intersection with 2026 local lists

77 of this cohort’s 98 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (78.6%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

Observation setList recordsNew-applicant recordsReview recordsMapped company IDs
National list records linked to this cohort’s IDs7707777

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

Stored 2026 local-recommendation records, sources and stage definitions

Recorded roles and delivery checks

Delivery framework, stages and original sources

Related studies and shared records

Shared records with Guangdong / Next-generation information technology / 5th batch Company Structure Study: 46; records in this cohort but outside that set: 52. The intersection/union ratio is 24.3%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Guangdong / Electronic information and digital technology / Core components and digital hardware Company Structure Study: 46; records in this cohort but outside that set: 52. The intersection/union ratio is 12.7%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Company samples and record links

CompanyJurisdictionRecorded industry
Shanghai B.L Electronics Co., Ltd.ShanghaiNext-generation information technology
Guangdong Tongya Technology Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
Magn Tek Electronics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.ShanghaiNext-generation information technology
Guangzhou On-Bright Electronics Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
Dong Guan Churod Electronics Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
Anhui Ruizhixing Electronic Technology Group Co., Ltd.AnhuiNext-generation information technology
Huizhou Epower Electronics Co., Ltd.GuangdongNext-generation information technology
E.Redox Chemicals Co., Ltd.AnhuiNext-generation information technology

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.

Directly related profiles and reports

Methodology

Read ID deduplication, comparison, batch and evidence definitions