Jiangsu / Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware Company Structure Study

Comparative structure study

The largest recorded industry, New-energy vehicles, contains 39 records (50.6% of this 77-record cohort). The remaining cohort contains 38 records. The comparison concerns archive composition.

The recorded sub-industry label Automotive structural parts and components accounts for 40.3% here (31/77), compared with 31.8% in the parent set (161/506), an absolute gap of 8.4 percentage points.

40/77 companies link to pages with existing source-supported excerpts (51.9% of the cohort). The other 37 records remain usable for archive composition, but do not support new operating case studies.

An ID-deduplicated archive snapshot, not the whole market, current recognition or operating results.

The parent set, Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware, contains 506 records. This cohort contributes 77 (15.2%); 429 records remain after excluding it.

The parent set, Jiangsu, contains 3,025 records. This cohort contributes 77 (2.5%); 2,948 records remain after excluding it.

Ratio of label participation, not market share; multi-label counts overlap.

Excluding this cohort, the recorded sub-industry label Automotive structural parts and components covers 130/429 remaining records (30.3%), an absolute gap of 10.0 percentage points from this cohort.

The full industry distribution has 8 labels; the top 3 contain 70/77 records (90.9%).Other known labels contain 7 records.

For 77 records with known labels, the effective category count is 2.6, versus 8 actual labels. Definitions and scope are in the methodology.

Record counts do not rank supply capability or economic size.

Non-empty fields are not necessarily accurate or supported by originals.

Counts concern existing reviewed bilingual excerpts, not re-certification of originals or entire reports.

A rule hit prioritises review; it does not establish that the entire field is wrong. One record can trigger several rules.

21 of this cohort’s 77 records link through existing company-ID mappings to 2026 lists from all jurisdictions (27.3%). This intersection measures list linkage, not successful recognition or company growth.

List rows and company IDs are separate counts, not new firms or final recognition.

The 2025 macro context for Jiangsu uses a different denominator from this cohort.

Shared records with Jiangsu / New-energy vehicles Company Structure Study: 39; records in this cohort but outside that set: 38. The intersection/union ratio is 19.8%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Shared records with Automotive and transport equipment / Core components and digital hardware Supply-chain Study: 77; records in this cohort but outside that set: 0. The intersection/union ratio is 15.2%, a measure of label overlap rather than business collaboration. Read comparison

Stable-ID samples, not rankings; metrics use the full cohort.